Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis

Effective Complaint handling is fundamental to the growth of businesses and other institutions including the higher education institutions (HEIs). Education although argued to be mainly public good, higher education students are perceived as customers in a private enterprise and sometimes mixed good...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sodiq O, Omoola, Kayode, Bakare Kazeem, Aljannah, Amasa Firdausa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Albukhary International University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/101159/7/101159_Framework%20for%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20Malaysian%20Higher%20Education.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/101159/
https://asbj.aiu.edu.my/vol3issue1june2022
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.101159
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.1011592022-11-16T06:54:23Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/101159/ Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis Sodiq O, Omoola Kayode, Bakare Kazeem Aljannah, Amasa Firdausa K623 Civil Law Effective Complaint handling is fundamental to the growth of businesses and other institutions including the higher education institutions (HEIs). Education although argued to be mainly public good, higher education students are perceived as customers in a private enterprise and sometimes mixed goods. This perception reinforces the need to focus on the satisfaction of students on the quality of services they receive in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). An effective complaint handling mechanism is therefore a means to ensure student complaints do not aggravate to conflicts. This aspect has not been adequately addressed in literatures; the laws of Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia have no clear provisions for complaint handling. Doctrinal method and qualitative techniques are employed in this work by online search of existing legislation in Malaysia, United States, United Kingdom, and other countries. Also, utilizing library materials, and internet sources like google scholar, Hein Online and, Jstor and Ebscohost (IIUM Discovery online) to discover literatures on this subject. This method reveals the global best practices in higher education complaint handling. The United Kingdom, United States and Australia are the models examined because these are foremost countries where University Ombudsmen offices were established and the complaint handling system in universities have developed overtime. Independence, accessibility, transparency, hierarchy of complaints (internal and external independent Ombudsmen) are some of the unique qualities in the complaint handling system in the countries especially in the United Kingdom. This paper therefore proposes a similar framework for Malaysia’s HEIs.All papers must include an Abstract. The Abstract and Keywords text should be 11 point Calibri, full justified and contained within one paragraph. Begin the Abstract with the word ABSTRACT. Do not Indent. Do not cite references in the abstract. The abstract should be approximately 150 words. Avoid using abbreviations in the abstract. Albukhary International University 2022-06-08 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/101159/7/101159_Framework%20for%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20Malaysian%20Higher%20Education.pdf Sodiq O, Omoola and Kayode, Bakare Kazeem and Aljannah, Amasa Firdausa (2022) Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis. Albukhary Social Business Journal, 3 (1). pp. 44-59. https://asbj.aiu.edu.my/vol3issue1june2022 10.55862/asbjV3I1a006
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic K623 Civil Law
spellingShingle K623 Civil Law
Sodiq O, Omoola
Kayode, Bakare Kazeem
Aljannah, Amasa Firdausa
Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis
description Effective Complaint handling is fundamental to the growth of businesses and other institutions including the higher education institutions (HEIs). Education although argued to be mainly public good, higher education students are perceived as customers in a private enterprise and sometimes mixed goods. This perception reinforces the need to focus on the satisfaction of students on the quality of services they receive in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). An effective complaint handling mechanism is therefore a means to ensure student complaints do not aggravate to conflicts. This aspect has not been adequately addressed in literatures; the laws of Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia have no clear provisions for complaint handling. Doctrinal method and qualitative techniques are employed in this work by online search of existing legislation in Malaysia, United States, United Kingdom, and other countries. Also, utilizing library materials, and internet sources like google scholar, Hein Online and, Jstor and Ebscohost (IIUM Discovery online) to discover literatures on this subject. This method reveals the global best practices in higher education complaint handling. The United Kingdom, United States and Australia are the models examined because these are foremost countries where University Ombudsmen offices were established and the complaint handling system in universities have developed overtime. Independence, accessibility, transparency, hierarchy of complaints (internal and external independent Ombudsmen) are some of the unique qualities in the complaint handling system in the countries especially in the United Kingdom. This paper therefore proposes a similar framework for Malaysia’s HEIs.All papers must include an Abstract. The Abstract and Keywords text should be 11 point Calibri, full justified and contained within one paragraph. Begin the Abstract with the word ABSTRACT. Do not Indent. Do not cite references in the abstract. The abstract should be approximately 150 words. Avoid using abbreviations in the abstract.
format Article
author Sodiq O, Omoola
Kayode, Bakare Kazeem
Aljannah, Amasa Firdausa
author_facet Sodiq O, Omoola
Kayode, Bakare Kazeem
Aljannah, Amasa Firdausa
author_sort Sodiq O, Omoola
title Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis
title_short Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis
title_full Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis
title_fullStr Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Framework for dispute resolution in Malaysian Higher Education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis
title_sort framework for dispute resolution in malaysian higher education: a cross-jurisdictional analysis
publisher Albukhary International University
publishDate 2022
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/101159/7/101159_Framework%20for%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20Malaysian%20Higher%20Education.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/101159/
https://asbj.aiu.edu.my/vol3issue1june2022
_version_ 1751535915018223616
score 13.160551