How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies?

The purpose of this study is to identify the level of Multiple Intelligence knowledge among the English language instructors in Sabah. 32 respondents from four educational institutions in Kota Kinabalu participated in this research. The data was obtained through a set of questionnaires that was modi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iziana Hani Ismail, Nur Anneliza Abd Latip, Wardatul Akmam Din, Suyansah Swanto
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Global Academic Excellence 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/1/Abstract.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/2/Fulltext.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/
https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.729008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.35679
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.356792023-06-21T07:55:19Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/ How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies? Iziana Hani Ismail Nur Anneliza Abd Latip Wardatul Akmam Din Suyansah Swanto LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) PE1001-1693 Modern English The purpose of this study is to identify the level of Multiple Intelligence knowledge among the English language instructors in Sabah. 32 respondents from four educational institutions in Kota Kinabalu participated in this research. The data was obtained through a set of questionnaires that was modified and adapted from Thomas Armstrong (1994) to suit the objectives of this research. The modification and adaptation of the research instruments was done to meet the research objectives and the situation of the research. The set of questionnaire comprises of three parts. Part A touches on the demographic characteristics of the English language instructors, part B focuses on the knowledge level of the theory, and Part C targets on the teaching strategies in the English language classrooms. The marks were counted manually to find the connection between the knowledge level of Multiple Intelligences and the teaching strategies of the instructors in the classrooms. The finding of this research indicates that the English language teachers with excellent level of Multiple Intelligence knowledge do not necessarily have excellent varieties of teaching strategies, and vice versa. Global Academic Excellence 2022 Article NonPeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/1/Abstract.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/2/Fulltext.pdf Iziana Hani Ismail and Nur Anneliza Abd Latip and Wardatul Akmam Din and Suyansah Swanto (2022) How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies? Journal of Information System and Technology Management (JISTM), 10. pp. 97-108. https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.729008
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
PE1001-1693 Modern English
spellingShingle LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
PE1001-1693 Modern English
Iziana Hani Ismail
Nur Anneliza Abd Latip
Wardatul Akmam Din
Suyansah Swanto
How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies?
description The purpose of this study is to identify the level of Multiple Intelligence knowledge among the English language instructors in Sabah. 32 respondents from four educational institutions in Kota Kinabalu participated in this research. The data was obtained through a set of questionnaires that was modified and adapted from Thomas Armstrong (1994) to suit the objectives of this research. The modification and adaptation of the research instruments was done to meet the research objectives and the situation of the research. The set of questionnaire comprises of three parts. Part A touches on the demographic characteristics of the English language instructors, part B focuses on the knowledge level of the theory, and Part C targets on the teaching strategies in the English language classrooms. The marks were counted manually to find the connection between the knowledge level of Multiple Intelligences and the teaching strategies of the instructors in the classrooms. The finding of this research indicates that the English language teachers with excellent level of Multiple Intelligence knowledge do not necessarily have excellent varieties of teaching strategies, and vice versa.
format Article
author Iziana Hani Ismail
Nur Anneliza Abd Latip
Wardatul Akmam Din
Suyansah Swanto
author_facet Iziana Hani Ismail
Nur Anneliza Abd Latip
Wardatul Akmam Din
Suyansah Swanto
author_sort Iziana Hani Ismail
title How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies?
title_short How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies?
title_full How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies?
title_fullStr How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies?
title_full_unstemmed How Does the Multiple Intelligence Knowledge Influence English as a Second Language (ESL) Instructor's Teaching Strategies?
title_sort how does the multiple intelligence knowledge influence english as a second language (esl) instructor's teaching strategies?
publisher Global Academic Excellence
publishDate 2022
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/1/Abstract.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/2/Fulltext.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35679/
https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.729008
_version_ 1769843680527515648
score 13.160551