Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory

Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory was initially called the vertical dyad linkage theory. Graen and Cashman introduced it in 1975. It emphasizes on the dyadic relationships between leaders and individual subordinates, instead of the traits or behaviors of leaders or situational characteristics. Acc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azlawati, Fahmi
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3629/1/s89311.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3629/
http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000336383
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.etd.3629
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.etd.36292022-04-21T03:47:52Z https://etd.uum.edu.my/3629/ Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory Azlawati, Fahmi HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory was initially called the vertical dyad linkage theory. Graen and Cashman introduced it in 1975. It emphasizes on the dyadic relationships between leaders and individual subordinates, instead of the traits or behaviors of leaders or situational characteristics. According to LMX theory, leaders do not treat all subordinates in the same manner, but establish close relationships with some (the in-group) while remaining aloof from others (the out-group). Therefore, this study is intended to examine the perception of out-group members in relation to favoritism, impression management tactics, perception of inequity and member-member exchange (MMX). The respondents of the study are 95 middle managers in the SUK, Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan. The study found that members do not have perception of injustice when they see in-group members as relying on the use of impression management tactics to gain inclusion into the in-group. There is no positive relationship between favoritism and perception of inequity. Similarly, favoritism does not lead to lower MMX. The result also found that perception of injustice does not mediate the relationship between LMX of in-group members and MMX. On the other hand, the study found that level of MMX is affected by LMX. Level of MMX is also affected by perception of justice. Since research on dysfunctional LMX is hardly been attempted in Malaysia, it is interesting to further explore this subject in different context and in a larger scale. Future research may expand the LMX theory developed. 2009 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en https://etd.uum.edu.my/3629/1/s89311.pdf Azlawati, Fahmi (2009) Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory. Masters thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia. http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000336383
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Electronic Theses
url_provider http://etd.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management
Azlawati, Fahmi
Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
description Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory was initially called the vertical dyad linkage theory. Graen and Cashman introduced it in 1975. It emphasizes on the dyadic relationships between leaders and individual subordinates, instead of the traits or behaviors of leaders or situational characteristics. According to LMX theory, leaders do not treat all subordinates in the same manner, but establish close relationships with some (the in-group) while remaining aloof from others (the out-group). Therefore, this study is intended to examine the perception of out-group members in relation to favoritism, impression management tactics, perception of inequity and member-member exchange (MMX). The respondents of the study are 95 middle managers in the SUK, Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan. The study found that members do not have perception of injustice when they see in-group members as relying on the use of impression management tactics to gain inclusion into the in-group. There is no positive relationship between favoritism and perception of inequity. Similarly, favoritism does not lead to lower MMX. The result also found that perception of injustice does not mediate the relationship between LMX of in-group members and MMX. On the other hand, the study found that level of MMX is affected by LMX. Level of MMX is also affected by perception of justice. Since research on dysfunctional LMX is hardly been attempted in Malaysia, it is interesting to further explore this subject in different context and in a larger scale. Future research may expand the LMX theory developed.
format Thesis
author Azlawati, Fahmi
author_facet Azlawati, Fahmi
author_sort Azlawati, Fahmi
title Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
title_short Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
title_full Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
title_fullStr Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
title_full_unstemmed Dysfunctional of Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
title_sort dysfunctional of leader - member exchange (lmx) theory
publishDate 2009
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3629/1/s89311.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3629/
http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000336383
_version_ 1731228142105788416
score 13.18916