Self Tuning PID Control Of Antilock Braking System Using Electronic Wedge Brake

This paper describes the design of an antilock braking system (ABS) control for a passenger vehicle that employs an electronic wedge brake (EWB). The system is based on a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) vehicle dynamic traction model, with the EWB acting as the brake actuator. The developed control st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad, Fauzi, Haris, Sharil Izwan, Mat Yamin, Ahmad Kamal, Che Hasan, Mohd Hanif, Mat Nuri @ Md Din, Nur Rashid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2021
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25799/2/SELF%20TUNING%20PID.PDF
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25799/
https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/6413/1701
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper describes the design of an antilock braking system (ABS) control for a passenger vehicle that employs an electronic wedge brake (EWB). The system is based on a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) vehicle dynamic traction model, with the EWB acting as the brake actuator. The developed control structure, known as the Self-Tuning PID controller, is made up of a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller that serves as the main feedback loop control and a fuzzy supervisory system that serves as a tuner for the PID controller gains. This control structure is generated through two structures, namely FPID and SFPID, where the difference between these two structures is based on the fuzzy input used. An ABS-based PI D controller and a fuzzy fractional PID controller developed in previous works were used as the benchmark, as well as the testing method, to evaluate the effectiveness of the controller structure. According to the results of the tests, the performance of the SFPID controller is better than that of other PID and FPID controllers, being 10% and 1% faster in terms of stopping time, 8% and 1% shorter in terms of stopping distance, 9% and 1% faster in terms of settling time, and 40% and 5% more efficient in reaching the target slip, respectively.