Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis

Inter-individual variability is a major challenge to guarantee adequate anaesthesia in patients across the population. This variability can occur as a result of patient physiology (e.g. age and weight), variations in the pharmacokinetic (PK) process and differences in the pharmacodynamic (PD) functi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang, J. J., Syafiie, S., Raja Ahmad, Raja Mohd Kamil, Lim, T. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher 2016
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54599/1/Inter-individual%20variability%20in%20propofol%20pharmacokinetic%2C%20pharmacodynamic%20PK%2C%20PD%20model%20%E2%80%93%20a%20sensitivity%20analysis.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54599/
http://saspublisher.com/sjams-411/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.54599
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.545992022-05-25T08:22:14Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54599/ Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis Chang, J. J. Syafiie, S. Raja Ahmad, Raja Mohd Kamil Lim, T. A. Inter-individual variability is a major challenge to guarantee adequate anaesthesia in patients across the population. This variability can occur as a result of patient physiology (e.g. age and weight), variations in the pharmacokinetic (PK) process and differences in the pharmacodynamic (PD) function. For a safe and effective drug administration, it is important to recognise which and when these factors of variability cause a higher uncertainty on depth of anaesthesia. This study aimed to quantify the influence of these input factors on the uncertainty in Bispectral Index (BIS). In this study, Sobol’ variance-based sensitivity analysis was performed on Schnider PK/PD model. Nine factors were evaluated: age, body weight, height, V1, V3, Cl1, Cl3, Ce50, and γ. The importance of these factors were ranked according to their total sensitivity indices. It was found that Ce50 has the most determining role on BIS prediction. γ is a significant factor during the induction phase. The PD model alone was found to responsible for 70% to 90% of BIS uncertainty during the maintenance phase. The variability of height has negligible influence on BIS prediction and can be omitted from the PK/PD model. Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher 2016 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54599/1/Inter-individual%20variability%20in%20propofol%20pharmacokinetic%2C%20pharmacodynamic%20PK%2C%20PD%20model%20%E2%80%93%20a%20sensitivity%20analysis.pdf Chang, J. J. and Syafiie, S. and Raja Ahmad, Raja Mohd Kamil and Lim, T. A. (2016) Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Science, 4 (11B). 3936 - 3942. ISSN 2347-954X; ESSN: 2320-6691 http://saspublisher.com/sjams-411/ 10.21276/sjams.2016.4.11.16
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Inter-individual variability is a major challenge to guarantee adequate anaesthesia in patients across the population. This variability can occur as a result of patient physiology (e.g. age and weight), variations in the pharmacokinetic (PK) process and differences in the pharmacodynamic (PD) function. For a safe and effective drug administration, it is important to recognise which and when these factors of variability cause a higher uncertainty on depth of anaesthesia. This study aimed to quantify the influence of these input factors on the uncertainty in Bispectral Index (BIS). In this study, Sobol’ variance-based sensitivity analysis was performed on Schnider PK/PD model. Nine factors were evaluated: age, body weight, height, V1, V3, Cl1, Cl3, Ce50, and γ. The importance of these factors were ranked according to their total sensitivity indices. It was found that Ce50 has the most determining role on BIS prediction. γ is a significant factor during the induction phase. The PD model alone was found to responsible for 70% to 90% of BIS uncertainty during the maintenance phase. The variability of height has negligible influence on BIS prediction and can be omitted from the PK/PD model.
format Article
author Chang, J. J.
Syafiie, S.
Raja Ahmad, Raja Mohd Kamil
Lim, T. A.
spellingShingle Chang, J. J.
Syafiie, S.
Raja Ahmad, Raja Mohd Kamil
Lim, T. A.
Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis
author_facet Chang, J. J.
Syafiie, S.
Raja Ahmad, Raja Mohd Kamil
Lim, T. A.
author_sort Chang, J. J.
title Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis
title_short Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis
title_full Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis
title_fullStr Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model – a sensitivity analysis
title_sort inter-individual variability in propofol pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (pk/pd) model – a sensitivity analysis
publisher Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher
publishDate 2016
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54599/1/Inter-individual%20variability%20in%20propofol%20pharmacokinetic%2C%20pharmacodynamic%20PK%2C%20PD%20model%20%E2%80%93%20a%20sensitivity%20analysis.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54599/
http://saspublisher.com/sjams-411/
_version_ 1734301579931025408
score 13.214268