Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics

A comparison study between Electromagnetism-Like Algorithm (EM) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) has been presented in this work to solve the Inverse Kinematics (IK) of a four-link planar robot manipulator. The comparison is focused on some points for both algorithms like the accuracy of the results and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abed, I.A., Koh, S.P., Mohamed Sahari, K.S., Tiong, S.K., Yap, D.F.W.
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: 2017
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uniten.dspace-5804
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-58042018-01-03T03:46:34Z Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics Abed, I.A. Koh, S.P. Mohamed Sahari, K.S. Tiong, S.K. Yap, D.F.W. A comparison study between Electromagnetism-Like Algorithm (EM) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) has been presented in this work to solve the Inverse Kinematics (IK) of a four-link planar robot manipulator. The comparison is focused on some points for both algorithms like the accuracy of the results and the speed of convergence. Different target points have been taken to check the performance of each algorithm to solve the IK problem. The results showed that EM algorithm needs less population size and number of generations to get the true solution. There are multiple robot configurations at the goal points and both algorithms are able to find these solutions at each point. Self developed software simulator is used to display some of these solutions at each goal position. © IDOSI Publications, 2012. 2017-12-08T07:26:19Z 2017-12-08T07:26:19Z 2012 Article 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.20.07.1771 en_US World Applied Sciences Journal Volume 20, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 946-954
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
language en_US
description A comparison study between Electromagnetism-Like Algorithm (EM) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) has been presented in this work to solve the Inverse Kinematics (IK) of a four-link planar robot manipulator. The comparison is focused on some points for both algorithms like the accuracy of the results and the speed of convergence. Different target points have been taken to check the performance of each algorithm to solve the IK problem. The results showed that EM algorithm needs less population size and number of generations to get the true solution. There are multiple robot configurations at the goal points and both algorithms are able to find these solutions at each point. Self developed software simulator is used to display some of these solutions at each goal position. © IDOSI Publications, 2012.
format Article
author Abed, I.A.
Koh, S.P.
Mohamed Sahari, K.S.
Tiong, S.K.
Yap, D.F.W.
spellingShingle Abed, I.A.
Koh, S.P.
Mohamed Sahari, K.S.
Tiong, S.K.
Yap, D.F.W.
Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics
author_facet Abed, I.A.
Koh, S.P.
Mohamed Sahari, K.S.
Tiong, S.K.
Yap, D.F.W.
author_sort Abed, I.A.
title Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics
title_short Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics
title_full Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics
title_fullStr Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics
title_sort comparison between genetic algorithm and electromagnetism-like algorithm for solving inverse kinematics
publishDate 2017
_version_ 1644493779762151424
score 13.19449