Market Isomorphism and Mobile Commerce Adoption in The Omnichannel: A Systematic Literature Review
Intense competition in the online retailing arena is transforming retailing systems to include mobile commerce resulting in increasing challenges to retailers since adoption is voluntary and changing consumer expectations shaped by circumstances, norms, and the need for new technology adaptations....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MAGScholar
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/40279/3/Market.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/40279/ https://magscholar.com/asian-journal-of-business-research/ajbr-vol-12-issue-2/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Intense competition in the online retailing arena is transforming retailing systems to include mobile commerce resulting in increasing challenges to retailers since
adoption is voluntary and changing consumer expectations shaped by circumstances, norms, and the need for new technology adaptations. As consumer behaviour is easily
affected by the increasing social interactions through social networking media, the human and social factors that technology adoption theories lacks were commonly added into the studies to improve predictive capabilities. Therefore, this study investigates the social dimension’s effects on technology adoption by adopting the institutional theory concept i.e., isomorphism, and conducting a systematic literature review exercise basing on the PRISMA framework. Articles review found organisation adoption studies commonly adapted institutional theory, but scarcity on consumer technology adoption. Isomorphic forces (i.e., coercive pressures, mimetic pressures, normative pressures) would significantly affect technological adoption and apply to both organisational and consumer adoption because individual
behaviour detects successful adoption. By understanding market isomorphic forces, retailers could use the facts to formulate marketing strategies. The systematic
literature review also showed variation in technology adoption because of cultural differences, norms, demographics, etc. Market isomorphism inclusion in consumer
adoption studies is scarce. Recommendation for inclusion is encouraged for further investigation into its discriminant validity and definitions. |
|---|