Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
This paper presents a performance comparison between two different control structures of Predictive Functional Control (PFC), namely centralized and hierarchical architectures for an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system. Centralized PFC utilizes a linearized model of the vehicle longitudinal dynami...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/7/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/13/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical%20predictive%20functional%20control%20for%20adaptive%20cruise%20control%20application_Scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/ https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/9237 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.iium.irep.109818 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.1098182024-05-20T01:44:28Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/ Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application Abdullah, Muhammad Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque Ahmad, Salmiah Rossiter, John Anthony TJ212 Control engineering TL1 Motor vehicles This paper presents a performance comparison between two different control structures of Predictive Functional Control (PFC), namely centralized and hierarchical architectures for an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system. Centralized PFC utilizes a linearized model of the vehicle longitudinal dynamics to compute the control law, while hierarchical PFC uses a simple kinematic model with inverse vehicle longitudinal dynamics. Based on the simulation results, both control structures produced a satisfactory performance. However, in the presence of disturbances such as road slopes and wind gusts, the centralized PFC becomes more sensitive and conservative than the hierarchical PFC. The main reason is that the linearization model used in centralized PFC is only effective around the selected nominal operating points. Since the decision-making process depends on the internal model performance, centralized PFC cannot compensate for this effect. Besides, it also takes a longer computation time than hierarchical PFC since more mathematical operations must be solved than the kinematic model, especially when physical and operational constraints are considered. The standard performance parameters such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), settling time, and rise time are also used for the analysis. These findings can become a solid justification for using the hierarchical PFC structure in designing an ACC system for future work. Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah 2023-12-26 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/7/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/13/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical%20predictive%20functional%20control%20for%20adaptive%20cruise%20control%20application_Scopus.pdf Abdullah, Muhammad and Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque and Ahmad, Salmiah and Rossiter, John Anthony (2023) Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 20 (4). pp. 10808-10820. ISSN : 2229-8649 E-ISSN 2180-1606 https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/9237 10.15282/ijame.20.4.2023.01.0836 |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English English |
topic |
TJ212 Control engineering TL1 Motor vehicles |
spellingShingle |
TJ212 Control engineering TL1 Motor vehicles Abdullah, Muhammad Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque Ahmad, Salmiah Rossiter, John Anthony Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application |
description |
This paper presents a performance comparison between two different control structures of Predictive Functional Control (PFC), namely centralized and hierarchical architectures
for an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system. Centralized PFC utilizes a linearized model of the vehicle longitudinal dynamics to compute the control law, while hierarchical PFC uses a simple kinematic model with inverse vehicle longitudinal dynamics. Based on the simulation results, both
control structures produced a satisfactory performance. However, in the presence of disturbances such as road slopes and wind gusts, the centralized PFC becomes more sensitive and conservative than the hierarchical PFC. The main reason is that the linearization model used in centralized PFC
is only effective around the selected nominal operating points. Since the decision-making process depends on the internal model performance, centralized PFC cannot compensate for this effect. Besides, it also takes a longer computation time than hierarchical PFC since more mathematical operations must be solved than the kinematic model, especially when physical and operational constraints are considered. The standard performance parameters such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), settling time, and rise time are also used for the analysis. These findings can become a solid justification for using the hierarchical PFC structure in designing an ACC system for future work. |
format |
Article |
author |
Abdullah, Muhammad Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque Ahmad, Salmiah Rossiter, John Anthony |
author_facet |
Abdullah, Muhammad Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque Ahmad, Salmiah Rossiter, John Anthony |
author_sort |
Abdullah, Muhammad |
title |
Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application |
title_short |
Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application |
title_full |
Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application |
title_fullStr |
Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application |
title_sort |
performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application |
publisher |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/7/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/13/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical%20predictive%20functional%20control%20for%20adaptive%20cruise%20control%20application_Scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/ https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/9237 |
_version_ |
1800081776288202752 |
score |
13.211869 |