Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application

This paper presents a performance comparison between two different control structures of Predictive Functional Control (PFC), namely centralized and hierarchical architectures for an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system. Centralized PFC utilizes a linearized model of the vehicle longitudinal dynami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah, Muhammad, Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque, Ahmad, Salmiah, Rossiter, John Anthony
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/7/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/13/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical%20predictive%20functional%20control%20for%20adaptive%20cruise%20control%20application_Scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/
https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/9237
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.109818
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.1098182024-05-20T01:44:28Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/ Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application Abdullah, Muhammad Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque Ahmad, Salmiah Rossiter, John Anthony TJ212 Control engineering TL1 Motor vehicles This paper presents a performance comparison between two different control structures of Predictive Functional Control (PFC), namely centralized and hierarchical architectures for an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system. Centralized PFC utilizes a linearized model of the vehicle longitudinal dynamics to compute the control law, while hierarchical PFC uses a simple kinematic model with inverse vehicle longitudinal dynamics. Based on the simulation results, both control structures produced a satisfactory performance. However, in the presence of disturbances such as road slopes and wind gusts, the centralized PFC becomes more sensitive and conservative than the hierarchical PFC. The main reason is that the linearization model used in centralized PFC is only effective around the selected nominal operating points. Since the decision-making process depends on the internal model performance, centralized PFC cannot compensate for this effect. Besides, it also takes a longer computation time than hierarchical PFC since more mathematical operations must be solved than the kinematic model, especially when physical and operational constraints are considered. The standard performance parameters such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), settling time, and rise time are also used for the analysis. These findings can become a solid justification for using the hierarchical PFC structure in designing an ACC system for future work. Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah 2023-12-26 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/7/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/13/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical%20predictive%20functional%20control%20for%20adaptive%20cruise%20control%20application_Scopus.pdf Abdullah, Muhammad and Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque and Ahmad, Salmiah and Rossiter, John Anthony (2023) Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 20 (4). pp. 10808-10820. ISSN : 2229-8649 E-ISSN 2180-1606 https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/9237 10.15282/ijame.20.4.2023.01.0836
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic TJ212 Control engineering
TL1 Motor vehicles
spellingShingle TJ212 Control engineering
TL1 Motor vehicles
Abdullah, Muhammad
Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque
Ahmad, Salmiah
Rossiter, John Anthony
Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
description This paper presents a performance comparison between two different control structures of Predictive Functional Control (PFC), namely centralized and hierarchical architectures for an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system. Centralized PFC utilizes a linearized model of the vehicle longitudinal dynamics to compute the control law, while hierarchical PFC uses a simple kinematic model with inverse vehicle longitudinal dynamics. Based on the simulation results, both control structures produced a satisfactory performance. However, in the presence of disturbances such as road slopes and wind gusts, the centralized PFC becomes more sensitive and conservative than the hierarchical PFC. The main reason is that the linearization model used in centralized PFC is only effective around the selected nominal operating points. Since the decision-making process depends on the internal model performance, centralized PFC cannot compensate for this effect. Besides, it also takes a longer computation time than hierarchical PFC since more mathematical operations must be solved than the kinematic model, especially when physical and operational constraints are considered. The standard performance parameters such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), settling time, and rise time are also used for the analysis. These findings can become a solid justification for using the hierarchical PFC structure in designing an ACC system for future work.
format Article
author Abdullah, Muhammad
Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque
Ahmad, Salmiah
Rossiter, John Anthony
author_facet Abdullah, Muhammad
Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque
Ahmad, Salmiah
Rossiter, John Anthony
author_sort Abdullah, Muhammad
title Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
title_short Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
title_full Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
title_fullStr Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
title_sort performance comparison between centralized and hierarchical predictive functional control for adaptive cruise control application
publisher Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
publishDate 2023
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/7/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/13/109818_Performance%20comparison%20between%20centralized%20and%20hierarchical%20predictive%20functional%20control%20for%20adaptive%20cruise%20control%20application_Scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/109818/
https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/9237
_version_ 1800081776288202752
score 13.160551