Impact of peer bullying on school students with and without ADHD symptoms: a cross-sectional study from Pakistan
The present study aims to identify the impact of peer bullying on school students with and without ADHD symptoms. Sample comprised of one thousand (N=1000) school going children with an age range 9-15 years whom belong to grades 6-10, were selected by using purposive sampling technique, taken fro...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2015
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10070/1/164-583-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10070/ http://spaj.ukm.my/ppppm/jpm/issue/view/23 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The present study aims to identify the impact of peer bullying on school students with and without
ADHD symptoms. Sample comprised of one thousand (N=1000) school going children with an age
range 9-15 years whom belong to grades 6-10, were selected by using purposive sampling technique,
taken from two major cities of Southern Punjab (Multan & Bahawalpur) Pakistan. Two scales were
used for data collection; Conners Teacher Rating Scale – (Revised) developed by © Conners (1997),
followed by Olweus Bullying Questionnaire by © Olweus (2007). Tools were formally translated by
following the guidelines of Eremenco, Cella, and Arnold (2005) into national language of Pakistan
(Urdu) and employing pilot study. ANOVA, standard deviation, t-test, and mean were calculated using
SPSS (21.0) to process the results. Findings suggest (t=10.096, P-Value=0.000) showing that there is
significant difference between the mean scores of bullying with ADHD and without ADHD symptoms
students. However, results on gender differences indicate (t=2.260, P-Value=0.024) there is a
significant difference between the impact of bullying on boys and girls. Results also show (F= 7.783,
P= 0.000) there is also noticeable difference in terms of bullying among all students in different grades
at 5% level of significance. Limitations of the study and recommendations for future research are also
enclosed. |
---|