Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG

The article aims to identify lecturers’ perspectives in implementing PISMP science curriculum in IPG Malaysia based on teaching experience with KIPP model. The respondents consisted of 105 lecturers from 20 IPG Malaysia. The study used a questionnaire consisting of 74 items covering the four dimensi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yahya, Fauziah, Hamdan, Abdul Rahim, Jantan, Hafsah, Salleh, Halimatussaadiah
Format: Article
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60373/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v4i3.4503
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.60373
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.603732022-04-05T05:22:07Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60373/ Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG Yahya, Fauziah Hamdan, Abdul Rahim Jantan, Hafsah Salleh, Halimatussaadiah LB Theory and practice of education The article aims to identify lecturers’ perspectives in implementing PISMP science curriculum in IPG Malaysia based on teaching experience with KIPP model. The respondents consisted of 105 lecturers from 20 IPG Malaysia. The study used a questionnaire consisting of 74 items covering the four dimensions (Context, Input, Process and Product). Data collected through questionnaires were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The study found that there was not a significant difference of curriculum goals and course objectives based on teaching experience at school. For input dimension, there was no significant difference of evaluation, content, source and pedagogy based on school teaching experience. In process dimension, there was no significant difference pedagogical process, the content and the process of assessment based on teaching experience at school. Furthermore, there was no significant difference of product dimension of science curriculum based on teaching experience at school. Based on the experience of teaching in IPG, lecturers did not have a significant difference of curriculum goals, course objectives, evaluation input, content, source, pedagogy, and evaluation process, and content process, but there were significant differences in the pedagogical input and product in the implementation of the PISMP science curriculum in IPG. Its discussions and recommendation were also discussed in this article. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2015 Article PeerReviewed Yahya, Fauziah and Hamdan, Abdul Rahim and Jantan, Hafsah and Salleh, Halimatussaadiah (2015) Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG. International Journal of Evaluation and Research inEducation, 4 (3). pp. 130-137. ISSN 2252-8822 http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v4i3.4503
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Yahya, Fauziah
Hamdan, Abdul Rahim
Jantan, Hafsah
Salleh, Halimatussaadiah
Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
description The article aims to identify lecturers’ perspectives in implementing PISMP science curriculum in IPG Malaysia based on teaching experience with KIPP model. The respondents consisted of 105 lecturers from 20 IPG Malaysia. The study used a questionnaire consisting of 74 items covering the four dimensions (Context, Input, Process and Product). Data collected through questionnaires were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The study found that there was not a significant difference of curriculum goals and course objectives based on teaching experience at school. For input dimension, there was no significant difference of evaluation, content, source and pedagogy based on school teaching experience. In process dimension, there was no significant difference pedagogical process, the content and the process of assessment based on teaching experience at school. Furthermore, there was no significant difference of product dimension of science curriculum based on teaching experience at school. Based on the experience of teaching in IPG, lecturers did not have a significant difference of curriculum goals, course objectives, evaluation input, content, source, pedagogy, and evaluation process, and content process, but there were significant differences in the pedagogical input and product in the implementation of the PISMP science curriculum in IPG. Its discussions and recommendation were also discussed in this article.
format Article
author Yahya, Fauziah
Hamdan, Abdul Rahim
Jantan, Hafsah
Salleh, Halimatussaadiah
author_facet Yahya, Fauziah
Hamdan, Abdul Rahim
Jantan, Hafsah
Salleh, Halimatussaadiah
author_sort Yahya, Fauziah
title Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
title_short Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
title_full Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
title_fullStr Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
title_full_unstemmed Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
title_sort perspective of lecturers in implementing pismp science curriculum in malaysia’s ipg
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60373/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v4i3.4503
_version_ 1729703259264778240
score 13.15806