Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans

Tempeh is recognised as an excellent source of plant protein and a promising meat substitute in the diet. Recently, the development of tempeh by blending different legumes has gained more attention, but references are limited. This study aimed to develop tempeh combinations of soybean with chickpea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z.J, Tan, M.F, Abu Bakar, S.Y, Lim, H, Sutimin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/11087/1/J17576_5037c91ce59c69dbdd999190c648702c.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/11087/
https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(2).088
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uthm.eprints.11087
record_format eprints
spelling my.uthm.eprints.110872024-06-04T03:05:19Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/11087/ Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans Z.J, Tan M.F, Abu Bakar S.Y, Lim H, Sutimin T Technology (General) Tempeh is recognised as an excellent source of plant protein and a promising meat substitute in the diet. Recently, the development of tempeh by blending different legumes has gained more attention, but references are limited. This study aimed to develop tempeh combinations of soybean with chickpeas and red kidney beans. The physical characteristics of the tempeh samples were recorded, and their nutritional compositions were determined in accordance with the standard AOAC methods. A sensory evaluation was also conducted by using the hedonic 9-scale test to study the overall acceptance of the tempeh. Our results indicated that the soybean and chickpea tempeh combination contained 31.08±0.41% protein, 9.88±1.42% fat, 16.57±1.90% carbohydrates, 13.49±0.03% crude fibre, 4.40±0.02% dietary fibre, 39.91±0.23% moisture, and 2.57±0.21% ash content per 100 g. Meanwhile, the soybean and red kidney bean tempeh combination had 30.39±0.12% protein, 9.43±1.02% fat, 13.31±0.78% carbohydrates, 11.88±0.03% crude fibre, 2.50±0.02% dietary fibre, 44.17±0.03% moisture, and 2.70±0.26% ash content per 100 g. Both mixed bean tempeh samples demonstrated high nutritional value. However, the sensory evaluation showed that the soybean and red kidney bean tempeh combination was preferred by most panellists due to its appearance, texture, taste, and aroma, with the highest overall acceptance score (7.54±0.85). In conclusion, our study highlights the potential of blending soybean with chickpeas and red kidney beans to develop tempeh with a high nutritional value. These findings could have significant implications for developing plant-based meat substitutes with desirable nutritional and sensory properties. 2024 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/11087/1/J17576_5037c91ce59c69dbdd999190c648702c.pdf Z.J, Tan and M.F, Abu Bakar and S.Y, Lim and H, Sutimin (2024) Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans. Food Research, 8 (2). 138 -146. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(2).088
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
building UTHM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
content_source UTHM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Z.J, Tan
M.F, Abu Bakar
S.Y, Lim
H, Sutimin
Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans
description Tempeh is recognised as an excellent source of plant protein and a promising meat substitute in the diet. Recently, the development of tempeh by blending different legumes has gained more attention, but references are limited. This study aimed to develop tempeh combinations of soybean with chickpeas and red kidney beans. The physical characteristics of the tempeh samples were recorded, and their nutritional compositions were determined in accordance with the standard AOAC methods. A sensory evaluation was also conducted by using the hedonic 9-scale test to study the overall acceptance of the tempeh. Our results indicated that the soybean and chickpea tempeh combination contained 31.08±0.41% protein, 9.88±1.42% fat, 16.57±1.90% carbohydrates, 13.49±0.03% crude fibre, 4.40±0.02% dietary fibre, 39.91±0.23% moisture, and 2.57±0.21% ash content per 100 g. Meanwhile, the soybean and red kidney bean tempeh combination had 30.39±0.12% protein, 9.43±1.02% fat, 13.31±0.78% carbohydrates, 11.88±0.03% crude fibre, 2.50±0.02% dietary fibre, 44.17±0.03% moisture, and 2.70±0.26% ash content per 100 g. Both mixed bean tempeh samples demonstrated high nutritional value. However, the sensory evaluation showed that the soybean and red kidney bean tempeh combination was preferred by most panellists due to its appearance, texture, taste, and aroma, with the highest overall acceptance score (7.54±0.85). In conclusion, our study highlights the potential of blending soybean with chickpeas and red kidney beans to develop tempeh with a high nutritional value. These findings could have significant implications for developing plant-based meat substitutes with desirable nutritional and sensory properties.
format Article
author Z.J, Tan
M.F, Abu Bakar
S.Y, Lim
H, Sutimin
author_facet Z.J, Tan
M.F, Abu Bakar
S.Y, Lim
H, Sutimin
author_sort Z.J, Tan
title Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans
title_short Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans
title_full Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans
title_fullStr Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans
title_sort nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans
publishDate 2024
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/11087/1/J17576_5037c91ce59c69dbdd999190c648702c.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/11087/
https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(2).088
_version_ 1803337335628103680
score 13.211869