Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process

Surface morphology homogeneity and energy modifications for in situ PVD process are two critical factors to prevent unexpected adhesion failure during machining or service. Unlike during film depositing, there is still much gap to be explored on applying pulsed biasing concepts to the substrate duri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hashim, Hanizam, Md Nizam, Abd Rahman, Noraiham, Mohamad, Mohd Soufhwee, Abd Rahman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/7079/1/Hanizam-ICME2012.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/7079/
http://www.ttp.net/1660-9336.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utem.eprints.7079
record_format eprints
spelling my.utem.eprints.70792022-02-14T14:33:23Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/7079/ Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process Hashim, Hanizam Md Nizam, Abd Rahman Noraiham, Mohamad Mohd Soufhwee, Abd Rahman TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Surface morphology homogeneity and energy modifications for in situ PVD process are two critical factors to prevent unexpected adhesion failure during machining or service. Unlike during film depositing, there is still much gap to be explored on applying pulsed biasing concepts to the substrate during in situ, to ensure the substrate surface readiness prior to film coating. The purpose of this paper is to study the effects of conventional direct current (DC) and pulse direct current (PDC) applied at substrate bias to the surface energy and crystallite size. Tungsten carbide (WC) cutting tool insert and titanium nitride (TiN) were used as substrate and hard coating respectively. The runs were conducted to compare the bias at DC (-500V) and PDC (-200V, -500V, -800V). The surface energy and crystallite size were characterized through wettability test and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The applying of PDC on the substrate bias was found to further enhance the characteristics of the surface compared to the conventional DC substrate bias. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland 2013 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/7079/1/Hanizam-ICME2012.pdf Hashim, Hanizam and Md Nizam, Abd Rahman and Noraiham, Mohamad and Mohd Soufhwee, Abd Rahman (2013) Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process. Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process, 315 (doi:10). pp. 98-102. ISSN 1660-9336 http://www.ttp.net/1660-9336.html
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
building UTEM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
content_source UTEM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utem.edu.my/
language English
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Hashim, Hanizam
Md Nizam, Abd Rahman
Noraiham, Mohamad
Mohd Soufhwee, Abd Rahman
Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process
description Surface morphology homogeneity and energy modifications for in situ PVD process are two critical factors to prevent unexpected adhesion failure during machining or service. Unlike during film depositing, there is still much gap to be explored on applying pulsed biasing concepts to the substrate during in situ, to ensure the substrate surface readiness prior to film coating. The purpose of this paper is to study the effects of conventional direct current (DC) and pulse direct current (PDC) applied at substrate bias to the surface energy and crystallite size. Tungsten carbide (WC) cutting tool insert and titanium nitride (TiN) were used as substrate and hard coating respectively. The runs were conducted to compare the bias at DC (-500V) and PDC (-200V, -500V, -800V). The surface energy and crystallite size were characterized through wettability test and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The applying of PDC on the substrate bias was found to further enhance the characteristics of the surface compared to the conventional DC substrate bias.
format Article
author Hashim, Hanizam
Md Nizam, Abd Rahman
Noraiham, Mohamad
Mohd Soufhwee, Abd Rahman
author_facet Hashim, Hanizam
Md Nizam, Abd Rahman
Noraiham, Mohamad
Mohd Soufhwee, Abd Rahman
author_sort Hashim, Hanizam
title Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process
title_short Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process
title_full Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process
title_fullStr Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process
title_full_unstemmed Surface Energy and Crystallite Size Comparisons by Applying Direct Current and Pulse Direct Current on Substrate Bias in PVD Process
title_sort surface energy and crystallite size comparisons by applying direct current and pulse direct current on substrate bias in pvd process
publisher Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland
publishDate 2013
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/7079/1/Hanizam-ICME2012.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/7079/
http://www.ttp.net/1660-9336.html
_version_ 1725976109396262912
score 13.211869