Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data

Challenge in developing a collaborative filtering (CF)-based recommendation system is the problem of cold-starting of items that causes the data to sparse and reduces the accuracy of the recommendations. Therefore, to produce high accuracy a match is needed between the types of data and the approach...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marisa, Fitri, Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah, Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah, Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad, Purnomowati, Wiwin, Pandey, Rakesh Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Science and Information Organization 2019
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/2/2019%20PERFORMANCE_COMPARISON_OF_COLLABORATIVE_FILTERING_APPROACH.PDF
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/
https://thesai.org/Downloads/Volume10No10/Paper_16-Performance_Comparison_of_Collaborative_Filtering_Approach.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utem.eprints.24308
record_format eprints
spelling my.utem.eprints.243082020-10-21T12:20:52Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/ Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data Marisa, Fitri Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad Purnomowati, Wiwin Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Challenge in developing a collaborative filtering (CF)-based recommendation system is the problem of cold-starting of items that causes the data to sparse and reduces the accuracy of the recommendations. Therefore, to produce high accuracy a match is needed between the types of data and the approach used. Two approaches in CF include user-based and item-based CFs, both of which can process two types of data; implicit and explicit data. This work aims to find a combination of approaches and data types that produce high accuracy. Cosine-similarity is used to measure the similarity between users and also between items. Mean Absolute Error is also measured to discover the accuracy of a recommendation. Testing of three groups of data based on sparseness results in the best accuracy in an explicit data-based approach that has the smallest MAE value. The result is that the average MAE value for user based (implicit data) is 0.1032, user based (explicit data) is 0.2320, item based (implicit data) is 0.3495, and item based (explicit data) is 0.0926. The best accuracy is in the item-based (explicit-data) approach which is the smallest average MAE value. Science and Information Organization 2019-10 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/2/2019%20PERFORMANCE_COMPARISON_OF_COLLABORATIVE_FILTERING_APPROACH.PDF Marisa, Fitri and Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah and Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah and Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad and Purnomowati, Wiwin and Pandey, Rakesh Kumar (2019) Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10 (10). pp. 110-116. ISSN 2158-107X https://thesai.org/Downloads/Volume10No10/Paper_16-Performance_Comparison_of_Collaborative_Filtering_Approach.pdf 10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0101016
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
building UTEM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
content_source UTEM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utem.edu.my/
language English
description Challenge in developing a collaborative filtering (CF)-based recommendation system is the problem of cold-starting of items that causes the data to sparse and reduces the accuracy of the recommendations. Therefore, to produce high accuracy a match is needed between the types of data and the approach used. Two approaches in CF include user-based and item-based CFs, both of which can process two types of data; implicit and explicit data. This work aims to find a combination of approaches and data types that produce high accuracy. Cosine-similarity is used to measure the similarity between users and also between items. Mean Absolute Error is also measured to discover the accuracy of a recommendation. Testing of three groups of data based on sparseness results in the best accuracy in an explicit data-based approach that has the smallest MAE value. The result is that the average MAE value for user based (implicit data) is 0.1032, user based (explicit data) is 0.2320, item based (implicit data) is 0.3495, and item based (explicit data) is 0.0926. The best accuracy is in the item-based (explicit-data) approach which is the smallest average MAE value.
format Article
author Marisa, Fitri
Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah
Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah
Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad
Purnomowati, Wiwin
Pandey, Rakesh Kumar
spellingShingle Marisa, Fitri
Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah
Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah
Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad
Purnomowati, Wiwin
Pandey, Rakesh Kumar
Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data
author_facet Marisa, Fitri
Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah
Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah
Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad
Purnomowati, Wiwin
Pandey, Rakesh Kumar
author_sort Marisa, Fitri
title Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data
title_short Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data
title_full Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data
title_fullStr Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data
title_sort performance comparison of collaborative-filtering approach with implicit and explicit data
publisher Science and Information Organization
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/2/2019%20PERFORMANCE_COMPARISON_OF_COLLABORATIVE_FILTERING_APPROACH.PDF
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/
https://thesai.org/Downloads/Volume10No10/Paper_16-Performance_Comparison_of_Collaborative_Filtering_Approach.pdf
_version_ 1681492547151593472
score 13.211869