Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data
Challenge in developing a collaborative filtering (CF)-based recommendation system is the problem of cold-starting of items that causes the data to sparse and reduces the accuracy of the recommendations. Therefore, to produce high accuracy a match is needed between the types of data and the approach...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Science and Information Organization
2019
|
Online Access: | http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/2/2019%20PERFORMANCE_COMPARISON_OF_COLLABORATIVE_FILTERING_APPROACH.PDF http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/ https://thesai.org/Downloads/Volume10No10/Paper_16-Performance_Comparison_of_Collaborative_Filtering_Approach.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utem.eprints.24308 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utem.eprints.243082020-10-21T12:20:52Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/ Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data Marisa, Fitri Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad Purnomowati, Wiwin Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Challenge in developing a collaborative filtering (CF)-based recommendation system is the problem of cold-starting of items that causes the data to sparse and reduces the accuracy of the recommendations. Therefore, to produce high accuracy a match is needed between the types of data and the approach used. Two approaches in CF include user-based and item-based CFs, both of which can process two types of data; implicit and explicit data. This work aims to find a combination of approaches and data types that produce high accuracy. Cosine-similarity is used to measure the similarity between users and also between items. Mean Absolute Error is also measured to discover the accuracy of a recommendation. Testing of three groups of data based on sparseness results in the best accuracy in an explicit data-based approach that has the smallest MAE value. The result is that the average MAE value for user based (implicit data) is 0.1032, user based (explicit data) is 0.2320, item based (implicit data) is 0.3495, and item based (explicit data) is 0.0926. The best accuracy is in the item-based (explicit-data) approach which is the smallest average MAE value. Science and Information Organization 2019-10 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/2/2019%20PERFORMANCE_COMPARISON_OF_COLLABORATIVE_FILTERING_APPROACH.PDF Marisa, Fitri and Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah and Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah and Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad and Purnomowati, Wiwin and Pandey, Rakesh Kumar (2019) Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10 (10). pp. 110-116. ISSN 2158-107X https://thesai.org/Downloads/Volume10No10/Paper_16-Performance_Comparison_of_Collaborative_Filtering_Approach.pdf 10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0101016 |
institution |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
building |
UTEM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
content_source |
UTEM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Challenge in developing a collaborative filtering (CF)-based recommendation system is the problem of cold-starting of items that causes the data to sparse and reduces the accuracy of the recommendations. Therefore, to produce high accuracy a match is needed between the types of data and the approach used. Two approaches in CF include user-based and item-based CFs, both of which can process two types of data; implicit and explicit data. This work aims to find a combination of approaches and data types that produce high accuracy. Cosine-similarity is used to measure the similarity between users and also between items. Mean Absolute Error is also measured to discover the accuracy of a recommendation. Testing of three groups of data based on sparseness results in the best accuracy in an explicit data-based approach that has the smallest MAE value. The result is that the average MAE value for user based (implicit data) is 0.1032, user based (explicit data) is 0.2320, item based (implicit data) is 0.3495, and item based (explicit data) is 0.0926. The best accuracy is in the item-based (explicit-data) approach which is the smallest average MAE value. |
format |
Article |
author |
Marisa, Fitri Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad Purnomowati, Wiwin Pandey, Rakesh Kumar |
spellingShingle |
Marisa, Fitri Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad Purnomowati, Wiwin Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data |
author_facet |
Marisa, Fitri Syed Ahmad, Sharifah Sakinah Mohd Yusoh, Zeratul Izzah Akhriza, Tubagus Mohammad Purnomowati, Wiwin Pandey, Rakesh Kumar |
author_sort |
Marisa, Fitri |
title |
Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data |
title_short |
Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data |
title_full |
Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data |
title_fullStr |
Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance Comparison Of Collaborative-Filtering Approach With Implicit And Explicit Data |
title_sort |
performance comparison of collaborative-filtering approach with implicit and explicit data |
publisher |
Science and Information Organization |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/2/2019%20PERFORMANCE_COMPARISON_OF_COLLABORATIVE_FILTERING_APPROACH.PDF http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24308/ https://thesai.org/Downloads/Volume10No10/Paper_16-Performance_Comparison_of_Collaborative_Filtering_Approach.pdf |
_version_ |
1681492547151593472 |
score |
13.211869 |