The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies

The case study had included thirty-three interviews among the four GLCs and adopted a post-positivist approach via the triangulation of multiple resources namely interview findings, document and literature review. The problem being investigated was on why knowledge strategy (KS) was significant to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Helmi, Asleena
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/46387/1/Asleena%20Helmi24.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/46387/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.usm.eprints.46387
record_format eprints
spelling my.usm.eprints.46387 http://eprints.usm.my/46387/ The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies Helmi, Asleena HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management The case study had included thirty-three interviews among the four GLCs and adopted a post-positivist approach via the triangulation of multiple resources namely interview findings, document and literature review. The problem being investigated was on why knowledge strategy (KS) was significant to the government-linked companies (GLCs) in Malaysia. Proposition one of the study stated that the implementation of KS was significant to the GLCs in order to achieve competitive advantage. The main factors which contributed to the successful implementation of KS that were investigated in this study were the levels of dynamic capability (DC); interorganizational relations (IOR) and value propositions namely the ‘knowledge value added’ (KVA) approach. The third proposition focused on analyzing any inherent KS differences being implemented by the GLCs; the application of the KVA approach indicated that the ratio of knowledge (ROK) among the four GLCs differed based on different levels of key performance indexes. The cases were found to have differed in the levels of KS maturity which illustrated the inherent differences in the KS being implemented by the GLCs. Based on the KPMG maturity model (1999), that the GLCs had achieved either pre-innovative or advanced stages allowing companies to identify where they stand in their KM journey and what initiatives or further steps of improvement the company to be considered. The findings from the case study were able to support the culmination of these three propositions. 2013-12 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/46387/1/Asleena%20Helmi24.pdf Helmi, Asleena (2013) The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies. PhD thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
building Hamzah Sendut Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sains Malaysia
content_source USM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.usm.my/
language English
topic HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management
Helmi, Asleena
The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies
description The case study had included thirty-three interviews among the four GLCs and adopted a post-positivist approach via the triangulation of multiple resources namely interview findings, document and literature review. The problem being investigated was on why knowledge strategy (KS) was significant to the government-linked companies (GLCs) in Malaysia. Proposition one of the study stated that the implementation of KS was significant to the GLCs in order to achieve competitive advantage. The main factors which contributed to the successful implementation of KS that were investigated in this study were the levels of dynamic capability (DC); interorganizational relations (IOR) and value propositions namely the ‘knowledge value added’ (KVA) approach. The third proposition focused on analyzing any inherent KS differences being implemented by the GLCs; the application of the KVA approach indicated that the ratio of knowledge (ROK) among the four GLCs differed based on different levels of key performance indexes. The cases were found to have differed in the levels of KS maturity which illustrated the inherent differences in the KS being implemented by the GLCs. Based on the KPMG maturity model (1999), that the GLCs had achieved either pre-innovative or advanced stages allowing companies to identify where they stand in their KM journey and what initiatives or further steps of improvement the company to be considered. The findings from the case study were able to support the culmination of these three propositions.
format Thesis
author Helmi, Asleena
author_facet Helmi, Asleena
author_sort Helmi, Asleena
title The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies
title_short The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies
title_full The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies
title_fullStr The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies
title_full_unstemmed The Implementation Of Knowledge Strategies For Competitive Advantage In Selected Malaysian Government- Linked Companies
title_sort implementation of knowledge strategies for competitive advantage in selected malaysian government- linked companies
publishDate 2013
url http://eprints.usm.my/46387/1/Asleena%20Helmi24.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/46387/
_version_ 1662755777613398016
score 13.145442