Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus

This study investigated the difference of antioxidants activity from different extraction techniques of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Three different extraction techniques involved were aqueous extraction, high-pressure steam extraction and 70% ethanol extraction. Total phenolic conten...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alias, Nur Diyana, Puteh, Fadzilah, Mohd Zulkifli, Nurin Izzati, Noor Hasnan, Noor Zafira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: HH Publisher 2021
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97175/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97175/
https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/AAFRJ/article/view/259
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.97175
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.971752022-09-13T08:17:58Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97175/ Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus Alias, Nur Diyana Puteh, Fadzilah Mohd Zulkifli, Nurin Izzati Noor Hasnan, Noor Zafira This study investigated the difference of antioxidants activity from different extraction techniques of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Three different extraction techniques involved were aqueous extraction, high-pressure steam extraction and 70% ethanol extraction. Total phenolic content (TPC) was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The antioxidant activities were analysed using ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). The high-pressure steam extract showed the highest total phenolic content and both FRAP and DPPH activities at 127.87 ± 0.08 mg GAE/g, 53.38 ± 2.76 mg AAE/g and 79.92 ± 0.26 mg AAE/g. Meanwhile, the aqueous extract showed 2-fold higher of total phenolic content compared to ethanol extract at 65.73 ± 9.44 and 30.61 ± 0.00 mg GAE/g. Conversely, antioxidant activities obtained from ethanol extracts (41.49 ± 2.54 and 41.10 ± 0.10 mg AAE/g.) were higher compared to aqueous extract (23.29 ± 0.47 and 5.24 ± 0.38 mg AAE/g.). This study suggests that different extraction methods influenced the findings of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of the Jerusalem artichoke. Hence, Jerusalem artichoke can be considered as a potential source of natural antioxidants. HH Publisher 2021 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97175/1/ABSTRACT.pdf Alias, Nur Diyana and Puteh, Fadzilah and Mohd Zulkifli, Nurin Izzati and Noor Hasnan, Noor Zafira (2021) Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus. Advances in Agricultural and Food Research Journal, 2 (1). pp. 1-12. ISSN 2736-1799 https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/AAFRJ/article/view/259 10.36877/aafrj.a0000165
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description This study investigated the difference of antioxidants activity from different extraction techniques of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Three different extraction techniques involved were aqueous extraction, high-pressure steam extraction and 70% ethanol extraction. Total phenolic content (TPC) was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The antioxidant activities were analysed using ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). The high-pressure steam extract showed the highest total phenolic content and both FRAP and DPPH activities at 127.87 ± 0.08 mg GAE/g, 53.38 ± 2.76 mg AAE/g and 79.92 ± 0.26 mg AAE/g. Meanwhile, the aqueous extract showed 2-fold higher of total phenolic content compared to ethanol extract at 65.73 ± 9.44 and 30.61 ± 0.00 mg GAE/g. Conversely, antioxidant activities obtained from ethanol extracts (41.49 ± 2.54 and 41.10 ± 0.10 mg AAE/g.) were higher compared to aqueous extract (23.29 ± 0.47 and 5.24 ± 0.38 mg AAE/g.). This study suggests that different extraction methods influenced the findings of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of the Jerusalem artichoke. Hence, Jerusalem artichoke can be considered as a potential source of natural antioxidants.
format Article
author Alias, Nur Diyana
Puteh, Fadzilah
Mohd Zulkifli, Nurin Izzati
Noor Hasnan, Noor Zafira
spellingShingle Alias, Nur Diyana
Puteh, Fadzilah
Mohd Zulkifli, Nurin Izzati
Noor Hasnan, Noor Zafira
Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus
author_facet Alias, Nur Diyana
Puteh, Fadzilah
Mohd Zulkifli, Nurin Izzati
Noor Hasnan, Noor Zafira
author_sort Alias, Nur Diyana
title Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus
title_short Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus
title_full Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus
title_fullStr Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of Helianthus tuberosus
title_sort evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities from different type of extraction technique of helianthus tuberosus
publisher HH Publisher
publishDate 2021
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97175/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97175/
https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/AAFRJ/article/view/259
_version_ 1744355309639434240
score 13.160551