Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method

Oil palm ripeness’ main evaluation procedure is traditionally accomplished by human vision. However, the dependency on human evaluators to grade the ripeness of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) by traditional means could lead to inaccuracy that can cause a reduction in oil palm fruit oil extracti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aliteh, Nor Aziana, Minakata, Kaiko, Tashiro, Kunihisa, Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki, Kobayashi, Kazuki, Nagata, Hirokazu, Misron, Norhisam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2020
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/1/38175.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/637
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.38175
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.381752020-05-03T23:03:09Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/ Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method Aliteh, Nor Aziana Minakata, Kaiko Tashiro, Kunihisa Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Kazuki Nagata, Hirokazu Misron, Norhisam Oil palm ripeness’ main evaluation procedure is traditionally accomplished by human vision. However, the dependency on human evaluators to grade the ripeness of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) by traditional means could lead to inaccuracy that can cause a reduction in oil palm fruit oil extraction rate (OER). This paper emphasizes the fruit battery method to distinguish oil palm fruit FFB ripeness stages by determining the value of load resistance voltage and its moisture content resolution. In addition, computer vision using a color feature is tested on the same samples to compare the accuracy score using support vector machine (SVM). The accuracy score results of the fruit battery, computer vision, and a combination of both methods’ accuracy scores are evaluated and compared. When the ripe and unripe samples were tested for load resistance voltage ranging from 10 Ω to 10 kΩ, three resistance values were shortlisted and tested for moisture content resolution evaluation. A 1 kΩ load resistance showed the best moisture content resolution, and the results were used for accuracy score evaluation comparison with computer vision. From the results obtained, the accuracy scores for the combination method are the highest, followed by the fruit battery and computer vision methods. MDPI 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/1/38175.pdf Aliteh, Nor Aziana and Minakata, Kaiko and Tashiro, Kunihisa and Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki and Kobayashi, Kazuki and Nagata, Hirokazu and Misron, Norhisam (2020) Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method. Sensors, 20 (3). art. no. 637. pp. 1-14. ISSN 1424-8220 https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/637 10.3390/s20030637
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Oil palm ripeness’ main evaluation procedure is traditionally accomplished by human vision. However, the dependency on human evaluators to grade the ripeness of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) by traditional means could lead to inaccuracy that can cause a reduction in oil palm fruit oil extraction rate (OER). This paper emphasizes the fruit battery method to distinguish oil palm fruit FFB ripeness stages by determining the value of load resistance voltage and its moisture content resolution. In addition, computer vision using a color feature is tested on the same samples to compare the accuracy score using support vector machine (SVM). The accuracy score results of the fruit battery, computer vision, and a combination of both methods’ accuracy scores are evaluated and compared. When the ripe and unripe samples were tested for load resistance voltage ranging from 10 Ω to 10 kΩ, three resistance values were shortlisted and tested for moisture content resolution evaluation. A 1 kΩ load resistance showed the best moisture content resolution, and the results were used for accuracy score evaluation comparison with computer vision. From the results obtained, the accuracy scores for the combination method are the highest, followed by the fruit battery and computer vision methods.
format Article
author Aliteh, Nor Aziana
Minakata, Kaiko
Tashiro, Kunihisa
Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Nagata, Hirokazu
Misron, Norhisam
spellingShingle Aliteh, Nor Aziana
Minakata, Kaiko
Tashiro, Kunihisa
Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Nagata, Hirokazu
Misron, Norhisam
Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
author_facet Aliteh, Nor Aziana
Minakata, Kaiko
Tashiro, Kunihisa
Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Nagata, Hirokazu
Misron, Norhisam
author_sort Aliteh, Nor Aziana
title Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
title_short Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
title_full Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
title_fullStr Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
title_full_unstemmed Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
title_sort fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2020
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/1/38175.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/637
_version_ 1665895960881922048
score 13.214268