Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method
Oil palm ripeness’ main evaluation procedure is traditionally accomplished by human vision. However, the dependency on human evaluators to grade the ripeness of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) by traditional means could lead to inaccuracy that can cause a reduction in oil palm fruit oil extracti...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI
2020
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/1/38175.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/ https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/637 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.upm.eprints.38175 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.upm.eprints.381752020-05-03T23:03:09Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/ Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method Aliteh, Nor Aziana Minakata, Kaiko Tashiro, Kunihisa Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Kazuki Nagata, Hirokazu Misron, Norhisam Oil palm ripeness’ main evaluation procedure is traditionally accomplished by human vision. However, the dependency on human evaluators to grade the ripeness of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) by traditional means could lead to inaccuracy that can cause a reduction in oil palm fruit oil extraction rate (OER). This paper emphasizes the fruit battery method to distinguish oil palm fruit FFB ripeness stages by determining the value of load resistance voltage and its moisture content resolution. In addition, computer vision using a color feature is tested on the same samples to compare the accuracy score using support vector machine (SVM). The accuracy score results of the fruit battery, computer vision, and a combination of both methods’ accuracy scores are evaluated and compared. When the ripe and unripe samples were tested for load resistance voltage ranging from 10 Ω to 10 kΩ, three resistance values were shortlisted and tested for moisture content resolution evaluation. A 1 kΩ load resistance showed the best moisture content resolution, and the results were used for accuracy score evaluation comparison with computer vision. From the results obtained, the accuracy scores for the combination method are the highest, followed by the fruit battery and computer vision methods. MDPI 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/1/38175.pdf Aliteh, Nor Aziana and Minakata, Kaiko and Tashiro, Kunihisa and Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki and Kobayashi, Kazuki and Nagata, Hirokazu and Misron, Norhisam (2020) Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method. Sensors, 20 (3). art. no. 637. pp. 1-14. ISSN 1424-8220 https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/637 10.3390/s20030637 |
institution |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
building |
UPM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
content_source |
UPM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Oil palm ripeness’ main evaluation procedure is traditionally accomplished by human vision. However, the dependency on human evaluators to grade the ripeness of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) by traditional means could lead to inaccuracy that can cause a reduction in oil palm fruit oil extraction rate (OER). This paper emphasizes the fruit battery method to distinguish oil palm fruit FFB ripeness stages by determining the value of load resistance voltage and its moisture content resolution. In addition, computer vision using a color feature is tested on the same samples to compare the accuracy score using support vector machine (SVM). The accuracy score results of the fruit battery, computer vision, and a combination of both methods’ accuracy scores are evaluated and compared. When the ripe and unripe samples were tested for load resistance voltage ranging from 10 Ω to 10 kΩ, three resistance values were shortlisted and tested for moisture content resolution evaluation. A 1 kΩ load resistance showed the best moisture content resolution, and the results were used for accuracy score evaluation comparison with computer vision. From the results obtained, the accuracy scores for the combination method are the highest, followed by the fruit battery and computer vision methods. |
format |
Article |
author |
Aliteh, Nor Aziana Minakata, Kaiko Tashiro, Kunihisa Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Kazuki Nagata, Hirokazu Misron, Norhisam |
spellingShingle |
Aliteh, Nor Aziana Minakata, Kaiko Tashiro, Kunihisa Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Kazuki Nagata, Hirokazu Misron, Norhisam Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method |
author_facet |
Aliteh, Nor Aziana Minakata, Kaiko Tashiro, Kunihisa Wakiwaka, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Kazuki Nagata, Hirokazu Misron, Norhisam |
author_sort |
Aliteh, Nor Aziana |
title |
Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method |
title_short |
Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method |
title_full |
Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method |
title_fullStr |
Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method |
title_sort |
fruit battery method for oil palm fruit ripeness sensor and comparison with computer vision method |
publisher |
MDPI |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/1/38175.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/38175/ https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/637 |
_version_ |
1665895960881922048 |
score |
13.214268 |