Synthesis of quinoxaline derivatives and their antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria
Quinoxaline derivatives, in which nitrogen substitutes for one or more carbon atoms in the naphthalene ring, are a significant class of hetero-cyclic compounds, and are well known in the pharmaceutical industry, and have been shown to possess a broad spectrum of biological activities. These formu...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111671/1/FS%202023%202%20-%20IR.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111671/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Quinoxaline derivatives, in which nitrogen substitutes for one or more carbon atoms in
the naphthalene ring, are a significant class of hetero-cyclic compounds, and are well
known in the pharmaceutical industry, and have been shown to possess a broad spectrum
of biological activities. These formulations make use of straightforward techniques to
create quinoxaline derivatives from aryl-thiols (mercaptan) compounds. Inspired by the
biological prominence of quinoxaline derivatives and trying to solve bacterial resistance
problems, in this study, 24 quinoxaline derivatives were synthesized. These series were
synthesized from the reaction of 2,3-dichloroquinoxaline (2,3-DCQ), 2-
chloroquinoxaline (2-CQ), 2-chloro-3-methyl quinoxaline (3-MCQ) with two different
aromatic aryl-thiols (mercaptan) and phenols in a single step to investigate the activities
aromatic derivatives. The compounds were synthesized using different solvent systems,
dimethylformamide (DMF)/ potassium triphosphate (K3PO4), methanol (MeOH)/
triethylamine (Et3N), acetone/ 0.1N sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and
dimethylformamide/potassium carbonate (DMF/ K2CO3), depending on the
nucleophilicity of the mercaptan compounds. A comparative study was used to compare
the efficiency of these solvent systems to synthesize the same target compounds
regarding the reaction time, percentage yield, purity of the compounds, and benignity
towards the environment. The structures of twenty-four compounds were confirmed by
applying spectroscopic analysis (1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR), and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS)). In
addition, four different bacteria were used to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of the
compounds (1-15): three Gram-negative (Escherichia coli (E. coli), Salmonella
Typhimurium, Enterobacter aerogenes), and Gram-positive (Bacillus Pumilus). To
assess a drug's efficacy against a particular bacterial species, the minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays are
frequently performed. The synthesized molecules displayed a better role as antibacterial
agents than their analogs. Compounds 8 and 14 have the strongest antibacterial activity
for Bacillus pumilus, with an inhibition zone of 10 and 9 mm (MIC ranging at about 5
and 2.5 mg/mL, followed by MBC at 2.5 mg/mL). A similar pattern of antibacterial
properties was observed against E. coli. Compounds 1 and 3 have an inhibition zone (IZ)
of 7 and 6 mm and MIC of 1.25 and 5 mg/mL, respectively. Similarly, di-substituted
derivatives 8, 13, and 14 have the best IZ of 11, 12, and 12 (mm) (MIC of 2.5, 5 and 5
mg/mL, followed by MBC of 2.5, 5 and 2.5 mg/mL). Due to impressive antibacterial
properties, the compounds were also studied for their physio-chemical and drug-likeness
properties via Swiss ADME software. It was found that molecules 9 and 11 displayed
remarkable drug-likeness properties without violating the rules and a bio-availability
score of 0.55. Like-wise molecular docking studies provided good interactions between
protein and ligands (synthesized compounds). The molecular docking studies were
performed on compounds 8, 12, 13, 14, 19 and 21. Compound 12 had the best docking
score of -8.60 kcal/mol followed by compound 13 (-8.01 kcal/mol) for DNA gyrase
protein. Compounds 12 and 13 are classified as di-substituted quinoxaline derivatives
having electron-withdrawing -NO2 and -COOH, which enhanced the formation of Hbonding
with amino acids. Compounds 12, 13 and 8 had a similar effect with PBP1a
protein (-8.01 kcal/mol for compound 8, -8.16 kcal/mol for compound 12 and -7.97
kcal/mol for compound 13). The reaction conditions for the synthesized compounds
were straightforward and produced using SNAr (aromatic nucleophilic substitution
reaction) mechanism. Antibacterial assays and docking investigations revealed that the
sulfur bridge made the molecule into a powerful antibacterial agent. Two symmetrical
sulfur bridges were shown to have increased antibacterial activity, making them a prime
option for medication development. |
---|