Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels

Sustainability is becoming an issue of public concern, particularly for large scale development projects. In this work, a multi-criteria approach, called the Sustainability Assessment Method (SAM), is used to asses and rank the sustainability of various types of power plants firing on different type...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yonaidi R., Boosroh M.H.
Other Authors: 35753891500
Format: Conference paper
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uniten.dspace-30811
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-308112023-12-29T15:53:46Z Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels Yonaidi R. Boosroh M.H. 35753891500 6506812468 Economic and environmental impact Power plant projects SAM indicator Sustainability assessment model Coal Coal industry Economics Environmental impact assessments Fossil fuel power plants Fuels Gases Investments Profitability Sustainable development Coal-fired power plant Combined cycle Economic impacts Fuel prices Gas-fired power plants Large-scale development Multi-criteria approach Negative values Oil and gas Power plant projects Public concern Sustainability assessment Sustainability assessment model Work study Environmental impact Sustainability is becoming an issue of public concern, particularly for large scale development projects. In this work, a multi-criteria approach, called the Sustainability Assessment Method (SAM), is used to asses and rank the sustainability of various types of power plants firing on different types of fuel. It traces the impacts of using coal, oil, and natural gas for power generation over its full life cycle. The current work studies the impacts that are related to the economy and environment. The environmental impacts comprise of emission to atmosphere, nuisances, footprint, and waste, while the economic impact are taxes, dividends, reinvestment, social investment, and project expenditure. Three different types of fuel in power generation are studied i.e. coal, oil and gas. It was found that coal fired power plant provides the highest positive economic impact because of its lowest fuel price, but it also produces high environmental impact. As a result, coal fired power plant has moderate SAM indicator (SAMi) of 3.55%. On the other hand, gas fired power plant has the lowest environmental impact, even though it has lower positive economic impact relative to those for coal fired power plant. The SAMi for gas fired power plant is 28.56%. The present work also shows that oil fired power plant has negative value for both economic and environmental impact (SAMi = -100%). It means that with the current tariff and price, oil fired combined cycle is not only unsustainable but also not profitable. Among three the fuels investigated, it can be concluded that gas fired power plant is the best alternative in terms of sustainability followed by coal and oil fired power plant. �2009 IEEE. Final 2023-12-29T07:53:45Z 2023-12-29T07:53:45Z 2009 Conference paper 10.1109/ICEENVIRON.2009.5398643 2-s2.0-77949609487 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77949609487&doi=10.1109%2fICEENVIRON.2009.5398643&partnerID=40&md5=02e91baf949baaf967f14bbe92536824 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30811 5398643 215 220 Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
topic Economic and environmental impact
Power plant projects
SAM indicator
Sustainability assessment model
Coal
Coal industry
Economics
Environmental impact assessments
Fossil fuel power plants
Fuels
Gases
Investments
Profitability
Sustainable development
Coal-fired power plant
Combined cycle
Economic impacts
Fuel prices
Gas-fired power plants
Large-scale development
Multi-criteria approach
Negative values
Oil and gas
Power plant projects
Public concern
Sustainability assessment
Sustainability assessment model
Work study
Environmental impact
spellingShingle Economic and environmental impact
Power plant projects
SAM indicator
Sustainability assessment model
Coal
Coal industry
Economics
Environmental impact assessments
Fossil fuel power plants
Fuels
Gases
Investments
Profitability
Sustainable development
Coal-fired power plant
Combined cycle
Economic impacts
Fuel prices
Gas-fired power plants
Large-scale development
Multi-criteria approach
Negative values
Oil and gas
Power plant projects
Public concern
Sustainability assessment
Sustainability assessment model
Work study
Environmental impact
Yonaidi R.
Boosroh M.H.
Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
description Sustainability is becoming an issue of public concern, particularly for large scale development projects. In this work, a multi-criteria approach, called the Sustainability Assessment Method (SAM), is used to asses and rank the sustainability of various types of power plants firing on different types of fuel. It traces the impacts of using coal, oil, and natural gas for power generation over its full life cycle. The current work studies the impacts that are related to the economy and environment. The environmental impacts comprise of emission to atmosphere, nuisances, footprint, and waste, while the economic impact are taxes, dividends, reinvestment, social investment, and project expenditure. Three different types of fuel in power generation are studied i.e. coal, oil and gas. It was found that coal fired power plant provides the highest positive economic impact because of its lowest fuel price, but it also produces high environmental impact. As a result, coal fired power plant has moderate SAM indicator (SAMi) of 3.55%. On the other hand, gas fired power plant has the lowest environmental impact, even though it has lower positive economic impact relative to those for coal fired power plant. The SAMi for gas fired power plant is 28.56%. The present work also shows that oil fired power plant has negative value for both economic and environmental impact (SAMi = -100%). It means that with the current tariff and price, oil fired combined cycle is not only unsustainable but also not profitable. Among three the fuels investigated, it can be concluded that gas fired power plant is the best alternative in terms of sustainability followed by coal and oil fired power plant. �2009 IEEE.
author2 35753891500
author_facet 35753891500
Yonaidi R.
Boosroh M.H.
format Conference paper
author Yonaidi R.
Boosroh M.H.
author_sort Yonaidi R.
title Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
title_short Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
title_full Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
title_fullStr Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
title_full_unstemmed Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
title_sort sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1806428085567881216
score 13.214268