Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels
Sustainability is becoming an issue of public concern, particularly for large scale development projects. In this work, a multi-criteria approach, called the Sustainability Assessment Method (SAM), is used to asses and rank the sustainability of various types of power plants firing on different type...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference paper |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-30811 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-308112023-12-29T15:53:46Z Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels Yonaidi R. Boosroh M.H. 35753891500 6506812468 Economic and environmental impact Power plant projects SAM indicator Sustainability assessment model Coal Coal industry Economics Environmental impact assessments Fossil fuel power plants Fuels Gases Investments Profitability Sustainable development Coal-fired power plant Combined cycle Economic impacts Fuel prices Gas-fired power plants Large-scale development Multi-criteria approach Negative values Oil and gas Power plant projects Public concern Sustainability assessment Sustainability assessment model Work study Environmental impact Sustainability is becoming an issue of public concern, particularly for large scale development projects. In this work, a multi-criteria approach, called the Sustainability Assessment Method (SAM), is used to asses and rank the sustainability of various types of power plants firing on different types of fuel. It traces the impacts of using coal, oil, and natural gas for power generation over its full life cycle. The current work studies the impacts that are related to the economy and environment. The environmental impacts comprise of emission to atmosphere, nuisances, footprint, and waste, while the economic impact are taxes, dividends, reinvestment, social investment, and project expenditure. Three different types of fuel in power generation are studied i.e. coal, oil and gas. It was found that coal fired power plant provides the highest positive economic impact because of its lowest fuel price, but it also produces high environmental impact. As a result, coal fired power plant has moderate SAM indicator (SAMi) of 3.55%. On the other hand, gas fired power plant has the lowest environmental impact, even though it has lower positive economic impact relative to those for coal fired power plant. The SAMi for gas fired power plant is 28.56%. The present work also shows that oil fired power plant has negative value for both economic and environmental impact (SAMi = -100%). It means that with the current tariff and price, oil fired combined cycle is not only unsustainable but also not profitable. Among three the fuels investigated, it can be concluded that gas fired power plant is the best alternative in terms of sustainability followed by coal and oil fired power plant. �2009 IEEE. Final 2023-12-29T07:53:45Z 2023-12-29T07:53:45Z 2009 Conference paper 10.1109/ICEENVIRON.2009.5398643 2-s2.0-77949609487 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77949609487&doi=10.1109%2fICEENVIRON.2009.5398643&partnerID=40&md5=02e91baf949baaf967f14bbe92536824 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30811 5398643 215 220 Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
topic |
Economic and environmental impact Power plant projects SAM indicator Sustainability assessment model Coal Coal industry Economics Environmental impact assessments Fossil fuel power plants Fuels Gases Investments Profitability Sustainable development Coal-fired power plant Combined cycle Economic impacts Fuel prices Gas-fired power plants Large-scale development Multi-criteria approach Negative values Oil and gas Power plant projects Public concern Sustainability assessment Sustainability assessment model Work study Environmental impact |
spellingShingle |
Economic and environmental impact Power plant projects SAM indicator Sustainability assessment model Coal Coal industry Economics Environmental impact assessments Fossil fuel power plants Fuels Gases Investments Profitability Sustainable development Coal-fired power plant Combined cycle Economic impacts Fuel prices Gas-fired power plants Large-scale development Multi-criteria approach Negative values Oil and gas Power plant projects Public concern Sustainability assessment Sustainability assessment model Work study Environmental impact Yonaidi R. Boosroh M.H. Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels |
description |
Sustainability is becoming an issue of public concern, particularly for large scale development projects. In this work, a multi-criteria approach, called the Sustainability Assessment Method (SAM), is used to asses and rank the sustainability of various types of power plants firing on different types of fuel. It traces the impacts of using coal, oil, and natural gas for power generation over its full life cycle. The current work studies the impacts that are related to the economy and environment. The environmental impacts comprise of emission to atmosphere, nuisances, footprint, and waste, while the economic impact are taxes, dividends, reinvestment, social investment, and project expenditure. Three different types of fuel in power generation are studied i.e. coal, oil and gas. It was found that coal fired power plant provides the highest positive economic impact because of its lowest fuel price, but it also produces high environmental impact. As a result, coal fired power plant has moderate SAM indicator (SAMi) of 3.55%. On the other hand, gas fired power plant has the lowest environmental impact, even though it has lower positive economic impact relative to those for coal fired power plant. The SAMi for gas fired power plant is 28.56%. The present work also shows that oil fired power plant has negative value for both economic and environmental impact (SAMi = -100%). It means that with the current tariff and price, oil fired combined cycle is not only unsustainable but also not profitable. Among three the fuels investigated, it can be concluded that gas fired power plant is the best alternative in terms of sustainability followed by coal and oil fired power plant. �2009 IEEE. |
author2 |
35753891500 |
author_facet |
35753891500 Yonaidi R. Boosroh M.H. |
format |
Conference paper |
author |
Yonaidi R. Boosroh M.H. |
author_sort |
Yonaidi R. |
title |
Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels |
title_short |
Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels |
title_full |
Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels |
title_fullStr |
Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels |
title_sort |
sustainaibility assessment of power plants projects firing on different fuels |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806428085567881216 |
score |
13.214268 |