Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review
Assessment and evaluation methodologies as well as combinations of them, for modelling of Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), are reviewed extensively and thoroughly in this paper. However, based on the types of robots and the kinds of interactions involved in the modelling of HRI, we concentrate just...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Inc.
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/1/Sim.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514011542 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.unimas.ir.10596 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.unimas.ir.105962021-06-22T14:37:14Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/ Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review Sim, Doreen Ying Ying Loo, Chu Kiong H Social Sciences (General) T Technology (General) Assessment and evaluation methodologies as well as combinations of them, for modelling of Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), are reviewed extensively and thoroughly in this paper. However, based on the types of robots and the kinds of interactions involved in the modelling of HRI, we concentrate just on the assistive social robot types. A comprehensive review has been done on each of these extensive evaluation and assessment methodologies applied for testing the usability of assistive social robots, user acceptance towards robots and robot acceptance in terms of behavioural adaptation during the HRI. The evaluation methodologies are reviewed based on the primary and non-primary basis, while the assessment methodologies are reviewed based on the type(s) of modelling approaches. We then discussed the weaknesses, strengths and uniqueness of each type of the past research work done on the evaluation and assessment methodologies. Comparison and contrast tables are also illustrated. Lastly, this paper provides our recommended directions, new vision, as well as our inspirations and new insights for future researches by highlighting the key areas for enhancing each of the past evaluation and assessment methodologies so that a better modelling approach for HRI can be achieved. Contributions of this review paper are also discussed thoroughly Elsevier Inc. 2015 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/1/Sim.pdf Sim, Doreen Ying Ying and Loo, Chu Kiong (2015) Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review. Information Sciences, 301. pp. 305-344. ISSN 0020-0255 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514011542 doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.12.017 |
institution |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
building |
Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS) |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
content_source |
UNIMAS Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ir.unimas.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
H Social Sciences (General) T Technology (General) |
spellingShingle |
H Social Sciences (General) T Technology (General) Sim, Doreen Ying Ying Loo, Chu Kiong Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review |
description |
Assessment and evaluation methodologies as well as combinations of them, for modelling
of Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), are reviewed extensively and thoroughly in this paper.
However, based on the types of robots and the kinds of interactions involved in the modelling
of HRI, we concentrate just on the assistive social robot types. A comprehensive
review has been done on each of these extensive evaluation and assessment methodologies
applied for testing the usability of assistive social robots, user acceptance towards robots
and robot acceptance in terms of behavioural adaptation during the HRI. The evaluation
methodologies are reviewed based on the primary and non-primary basis, while the
assessment methodologies are reviewed based on the type(s) of modelling approaches.
We then discussed the weaknesses, strengths and uniqueness of each type of the past
research work done on the evaluation and assessment methodologies. Comparison and
contrast tables are also illustrated. Lastly, this paper provides our recommended directions,
new vision, as well as our inspirations and new insights for future researches by highlighting
the key areas for enhancing each of the past evaluation and assessment methodologies
so that a better modelling approach for HRI can be achieved. Contributions of this review
paper are also discussed thoroughly |
format |
Article |
author |
Sim, Doreen Ying Ying Loo, Chu Kiong |
author_facet |
Sim, Doreen Ying Ying Loo, Chu Kiong |
author_sort |
Sim, Doreen Ying Ying |
title |
Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies
on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot
interaction – A review |
title_short |
Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies
on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot
interaction – A review |
title_full |
Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies
on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot
interaction – A review |
title_fullStr |
Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies
on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot
interaction – A review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies
on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot
interaction – A review |
title_sort |
extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies
on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot
interaction – a review |
publisher |
Elsevier Inc. |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/1/Sim.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514011542 |
_version_ |
1703964039120420864 |
score |
13.160551 |