Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review

Assessment and evaluation methodologies as well as combinations of them, for modelling of Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), are reviewed extensively and thoroughly in this paper. However, based on the types of robots and the kinds of interactions involved in the modelling of HRI, we concentrate just...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sim, Doreen Ying Ying, Loo, Chu Kiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc. 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/1/Sim.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514011542
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.10596
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.105962021-06-22T14:37:14Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/ Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review Sim, Doreen Ying Ying Loo, Chu Kiong H Social Sciences (General) T Technology (General) Assessment and evaluation methodologies as well as combinations of them, for modelling of Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), are reviewed extensively and thoroughly in this paper. However, based on the types of robots and the kinds of interactions involved in the modelling of HRI, we concentrate just on the assistive social robot types. A comprehensive review has been done on each of these extensive evaluation and assessment methodologies applied for testing the usability of assistive social robots, user acceptance towards robots and robot acceptance in terms of behavioural adaptation during the HRI. The evaluation methodologies are reviewed based on the primary and non-primary basis, while the assessment methodologies are reviewed based on the type(s) of modelling approaches. We then discussed the weaknesses, strengths and uniqueness of each type of the past research work done on the evaluation and assessment methodologies. Comparison and contrast tables are also illustrated. Lastly, this paper provides our recommended directions, new vision, as well as our inspirations and new insights for future researches by highlighting the key areas for enhancing each of the past evaluation and assessment methodologies so that a better modelling approach for HRI can be achieved. Contributions of this review paper are also discussed thoroughly Elsevier Inc. 2015 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/1/Sim.pdf Sim, Doreen Ying Ying and Loo, Chu Kiong (2015) Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review. Information Sciences, 301. pp. 305-344. ISSN 0020-0255 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514011542 doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.12.017
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic H Social Sciences (General)
T Technology (General)
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
T Technology (General)
Sim, Doreen Ying Ying
Loo, Chu Kiong
Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review
description Assessment and evaluation methodologies as well as combinations of them, for modelling of Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), are reviewed extensively and thoroughly in this paper. However, based on the types of robots and the kinds of interactions involved in the modelling of HRI, we concentrate just on the assistive social robot types. A comprehensive review has been done on each of these extensive evaluation and assessment methodologies applied for testing the usability of assistive social robots, user acceptance towards robots and robot acceptance in terms of behavioural adaptation during the HRI. The evaluation methodologies are reviewed based on the primary and non-primary basis, while the assessment methodologies are reviewed based on the type(s) of modelling approaches. We then discussed the weaknesses, strengths and uniqueness of each type of the past research work done on the evaluation and assessment methodologies. Comparison and contrast tables are also illustrated. Lastly, this paper provides our recommended directions, new vision, as well as our inspirations and new insights for future researches by highlighting the key areas for enhancing each of the past evaluation and assessment methodologies so that a better modelling approach for HRI can be achieved. Contributions of this review paper are also discussed thoroughly
format Article
author Sim, Doreen Ying Ying
Loo, Chu Kiong
author_facet Sim, Doreen Ying Ying
Loo, Chu Kiong
author_sort Sim, Doreen Ying Ying
title Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review
title_short Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review
title_full Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review
title_fullStr Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review
title_full_unstemmed Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review
title_sort extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – a review
publisher Elsevier Inc.
publishDate 2015
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/1/Sim.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10596/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514011542
_version_ 1703964039120420864
score 13.160551