Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach

Likert scales were used in this study to collect data on measures such as the student academic burnout scale, the student stress scale, the student self-efficacy beliefs scale and the student perceived teacher support scale. The purpose of this study is to examine the four-part scales' reliabil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingyuan Li, Yoon Fah Lay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Conscientia Beam 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/42722/1/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/42722/
https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v13i1.3987
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.42722
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.427222025-01-23T06:30:45Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/42722/ Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach Jingyuan Li Yoon Fah Lay LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) QA273-280 Probabilities. Mathematical statistics Likert scales were used in this study to collect data on measures such as the student academic burnout scale, the student stress scale, the student self-efficacy beliefs scale and the student perceived teacher support scale. The purpose of this study is to examine the four-part scales' reliability and validity used in this research. The number of measurement indicators for the four scales was 11, 13, 12 and 10, respectively. Seventy-five college students from five colleges and universities participated in the research and the partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach was applied to analyze the data. Consequently, the internal consistency and reliability of the measures were assessed using Cronbach's alpha (CA) and composite reliability (CR) both of which exceeded the clinical thresholds of 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. The average variance extracted (AVE) was used to evaluate the scales' convergent validity and the reported values were all stated above 0.5. The scales' discriminant validity was also framed within the range of threshold values. As a result, the scales used in this study demonstrated good validity and reliability and can be useful in assessing relationships throughout a range of study situations. Conscientia Beam 2025 Article NonPeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/42722/1/FULL%20TEXT.pdf Jingyuan Li and Yoon Fah Lay (2025) Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 13 (1). pp. 1-13. ISSN 2312-5659 https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v13i1.3987
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
topic LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
QA273-280 Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
spellingShingle LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
QA273-280 Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
Jingyuan Li
Yoon Fah Lay
Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach
description Likert scales were used in this study to collect data on measures such as the student academic burnout scale, the student stress scale, the student self-efficacy beliefs scale and the student perceived teacher support scale. The purpose of this study is to examine the four-part scales' reliability and validity used in this research. The number of measurement indicators for the four scales was 11, 13, 12 and 10, respectively. Seventy-five college students from five colleges and universities participated in the research and the partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach was applied to analyze the data. Consequently, the internal consistency and reliability of the measures were assessed using Cronbach's alpha (CA) and composite reliability (CR) both of which exceeded the clinical thresholds of 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. The average variance extracted (AVE) was used to evaluate the scales' convergent validity and the reported values were all stated above 0.5. The scales' discriminant validity was also framed within the range of threshold values. As a result, the scales used in this study demonstrated good validity and reliability and can be useful in assessing relationships throughout a range of study situations.
format Article
author Jingyuan Li
Yoon Fah Lay
author_facet Jingyuan Li
Yoon Fah Lay
author_sort Jingyuan Li
title Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach
title_short Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach
title_full Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach
title_fullStr Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach
title_full_unstemmed Examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using PLS-SEM approach
title_sort examining the reliability and validity of students’ self-efficacy beliefs, stress, perceived teachers’ support and academic burnout scales using pls-sem approach
publisher Conscientia Beam
publishDate 2025
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/42722/1/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/42722/
https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v13i1.3987
_version_ 1823092351216648192
score 13.235796