Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents

This study is a form of experimental analysis that utilizes used lubricating oil (ULO) in order to reclaim base oil by using a combination of acetic acid and two different adsorbents namely aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and river sand (RS). The two different adsorbents were used to compare for better quali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S M Anisuzzaman, Jashera Reddy
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: UniSE Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/2/FULLTEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/
https://tost.unise.org/pdfs/vol9/no1/ToST-9x1x14-20xOA.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.34434
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.344342022-10-12T03:06:08Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/ Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents S M Anisuzzaman Jashera Reddy TP670-699 Oils, fats, and waxes This study is a form of experimental analysis that utilizes used lubricating oil (ULO) in order to reclaim base oil by using a combination of acetic acid and two different adsorbents namely aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and river sand (RS). The two different adsorbents were used to compare for better quality of oil using the same method. The characterization of the recovered ULO samples was conducted by using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and the viscosity was tested by using the viscometer. Based on the results obtained, the Al2O3 seems to be a better adsorbent than RS in several tests such as density, sludge removal and viscosity. For better viscosity and mass of sludge values, the Al2O3 adsorbent is more suitable compared to the RS. It was found that by using Al2O3, there is a 26% viscosity reduction for ULO samples. By using RS, 6.67% viscosity reduction was found for ULO samples. 24.9% and 25.7% of sludge removal was found in ULO samples by Al2O3 and RS, respectively. FTIR analysis showed that before treatment oxidative compounds such as alkens and helides were present in the ULO and UEO samples. However, after treatment by both of the adsorbents, the oxidative compounds were removed. The removal of the alkenes and alkyl halides has evidently indicated the treatment was able to remove the oxidative compounds in the oil. UniSE Press 2022-04-20 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/1/ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/2/FULLTEXT.pdf S M Anisuzzaman and Jashera Reddy (2022) Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents. Transactions on Science and Technology, 19. pp. 14-20. ISSN 2289-8786 https://tost.unise.org/pdfs/vol9/no1/ToST-9x1x14-20xOA.html
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic TP670-699 Oils, fats, and waxes
spellingShingle TP670-699 Oils, fats, and waxes
S M Anisuzzaman
Jashera Reddy
Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents
description This study is a form of experimental analysis that utilizes used lubricating oil (ULO) in order to reclaim base oil by using a combination of acetic acid and two different adsorbents namely aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and river sand (RS). The two different adsorbents were used to compare for better quality of oil using the same method. The characterization of the recovered ULO samples was conducted by using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and the viscosity was tested by using the viscometer. Based on the results obtained, the Al2O3 seems to be a better adsorbent than RS in several tests such as density, sludge removal and viscosity. For better viscosity and mass of sludge values, the Al2O3 adsorbent is more suitable compared to the RS. It was found that by using Al2O3, there is a 26% viscosity reduction for ULO samples. By using RS, 6.67% viscosity reduction was found for ULO samples. 24.9% and 25.7% of sludge removal was found in ULO samples by Al2O3 and RS, respectively. FTIR analysis showed that before treatment oxidative compounds such as alkens and helides were present in the ULO and UEO samples. However, after treatment by both of the adsorbents, the oxidative compounds were removed. The removal of the alkenes and alkyl halides has evidently indicated the treatment was able to remove the oxidative compounds in the oil.
format Article
author S M Anisuzzaman
Jashera Reddy
author_facet S M Anisuzzaman
Jashera Reddy
author_sort S M Anisuzzaman
title Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents
title_short Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents
title_full Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents
title_fullStr Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents
title_full_unstemmed Recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents
title_sort recovery and characterization of used lubricating oil using acid with two different adsorbents
publisher UniSE Press
publishDate 2022
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/2/FULLTEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34434/
https://tost.unise.org/pdfs/vol9/no1/ToST-9x1x14-20xOA.html
_version_ 1760231294846894080
score 13.160551