Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin

Abundant, renewable and inexpensive soybean can be a good alternative to natural adhesive. Soy flour was modified by repeated digestion of soy flour by sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid. 5%, 10% and 20% modified soy flour (MSF) was then prepared. Medium density fibreboard (MDF) of 810 kg/m3 was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ng Yit Hui, Alicia
Format: Undergraduates Project Papers
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9007/1/CD8598%20%40%2063.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9007/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.9007
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.90072021-07-22T03:55:10Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9007/ Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin Ng Yit Hui, Alicia TP Chemical technology Abundant, renewable and inexpensive soybean can be a good alternative to natural adhesive. Soy flour was modified by repeated digestion of soy flour by sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid. 5%, 10% and 20% modified soy flour (MSF) was then prepared. Medium density fibreboard (MDF) of 810 kg/m3 was made using wood fibre and thickness swelling properties and mechanical properties were analyzed to determine the performance of the board. In the second part, the MSF concentration with the best mechanical result was used to prepare MSF with enzymatic hydrolase lignin (EHL) of that particular concentration. Laccase enzyme was added to 5% lignin to produce EHL. Thickness swelling and mechanical properties were analyzed to determine the performance of the board. FTIR and DSC analysis were performed to understand the structure and properties of all the different types of adhesive. Thickness swelling test exhibit that 5% MSF showed the least thickness swelling. However it did not meet the requirement of ASTM. 10% MSF with EHL did not show a better result either as it increased to more than 100%. For mechanical testing, internal bonding for 10% MSF showed the best result and it almost reached the ASTM standard. 10% MSF with EHL also showed similar result as the 10% modified soy flour. As for modulus of rupture, 10% MSF also had better results. However, both 10% MSF and MSF with lignin had results that were passing the ASTM standard 2014 Undergraduates Project Papers NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9007/1/CD8598%20%40%2063.pdf Ng Yit Hui, Alicia (2014) Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin. Faculty Of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang.
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Ng Yit Hui, Alicia
Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin
description Abundant, renewable and inexpensive soybean can be a good alternative to natural adhesive. Soy flour was modified by repeated digestion of soy flour by sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid. 5%, 10% and 20% modified soy flour (MSF) was then prepared. Medium density fibreboard (MDF) of 810 kg/m3 was made using wood fibre and thickness swelling properties and mechanical properties were analyzed to determine the performance of the board. In the second part, the MSF concentration with the best mechanical result was used to prepare MSF with enzymatic hydrolase lignin (EHL) of that particular concentration. Laccase enzyme was added to 5% lignin to produce EHL. Thickness swelling and mechanical properties were analyzed to determine the performance of the board. FTIR and DSC analysis were performed to understand the structure and properties of all the different types of adhesive. Thickness swelling test exhibit that 5% MSF showed the least thickness swelling. However it did not meet the requirement of ASTM. 10% MSF with EHL did not show a better result either as it increased to more than 100%. For mechanical testing, internal bonding for 10% MSF showed the best result and it almost reached the ASTM standard. 10% MSF with EHL also showed similar result as the 10% modified soy flour. As for modulus of rupture, 10% MSF also had better results. However, both 10% MSF and MSF with lignin had results that were passing the ASTM standard
format Undergraduates Project Papers
author Ng Yit Hui, Alicia
author_facet Ng Yit Hui, Alicia
author_sort Ng Yit Hui, Alicia
title Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin
title_short Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin
title_full Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin
title_fullStr Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin
title_full_unstemmed Preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin
title_sort preparation of adhesive using soy protein and lignin
publishDate 2014
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9007/1/CD8598%20%40%2063.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9007/
_version_ 1706957184475070464
score 13.211869