Overlapping sustainable construction indicators for construction organisations in Zimbabwe
Purpose: Sustainable construction deficits are common in developing economies, and resolutions are constrained by the failure to prioritise the plethora of available indicators. This study aims to report on overlapping indicators for benchmarking sustainable construction for construction organisatio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Emerald Publishing
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40005/1/Overlapping%20sustainable%20construction%20indicators%20for%20construction%20organisations.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40005/2/Overlapping%20sustainable%20construction%20indicators%20for%20construction%20organisations%20in%20Zimbabwe_ABS.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40005/ https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2023-0168 https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2023-0168 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose: Sustainable construction deficits are common in developing economies, and resolutions are constrained by the failure to prioritise the plethora of available indicators. This study aims to report on overlapping indicators for benchmarking sustainable construction for construction organisations. Design/methodology/approach: Online survey data were collected from construction professionals, academics and senior managers in government bodies. Pearson chi-squared tests and overlapping analysis were used to determine significant indicators. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to determine statistically significant differences among the dimensions. Findings: Overlapping analysis determined indicators significant for economic, environmental and social performance. Environmental protection and reporting (pollution and emissions) were significant for all three performance dimensions. The most significant indicators are economic performance (adequate competence of key project staff), environmental performance (environmental protection and reporting – pollution and emissions) and social performance (adequate sustainability expenditure by construction organisations). Significant differences due to dimensions existed for adequate competence of key project staff, sustainable construction and eco-design, adequate governance and organisational excellence of construction projects and satisfactory workers’ morale. Research limitations/implications: Determining overlapping indicators enables prioritised implementation that ensures sustainable construction. Excluding construction workers was a significant limitation for a holistic interrogation. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to determine overlapping indicators for sustainable construction performance in Zimbabwe. |
---|