Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.ump.umpir.23566 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.ump.umpir.235662019-01-02T03:03:58Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar T Technology (General) This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear. EDP Sciences 2018 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf Pathak, Sunil and Jain, Neelesh Kumar (2018) Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears. Manufacturing Review, 5 (14). pp. 1-9. ISSN 2265-4224 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 |
institution |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
building |
UMP Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
content_source |
UMP Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
T Technology (General) |
spellingShingle |
T Technology (General) Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears |
description |
This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage
differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear. |
format |
Article |
author |
Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar |
author_facet |
Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar |
author_sort |
Pathak, Sunil |
title |
Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears |
title_short |
Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears |
title_full |
Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears |
title_fullStr |
Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears |
title_sort |
performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 |
_version_ |
1643669632917176320 |
score |
13.209306 |