Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears

This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pathak, Sunil, Jain, Neelesh Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.23566
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.235662019-01-02T03:03:58Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar T Technology (General) This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear. EDP Sciences 2018 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf Pathak, Sunil and Jain, Neelesh Kumar (2018) Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears. Manufacturing Review, 5 (14). pp. 1-9. ISSN 2265-4224 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Pathak, Sunil
Jain, Neelesh Kumar
Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
description This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear.
format Article
author Pathak, Sunil
Jain, Neelesh Kumar
author_facet Pathak, Sunil
Jain, Neelesh Kumar
author_sort Pathak, Sunil
title Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_short Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_full Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_fullStr Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_full_unstemmed Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_sort performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2018
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
_version_ 1643669632917176320
score 13.209306