Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears

This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters o...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Pathak, Sunil, Jain, Neelesh Kumar
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: EDP Sciences 2018
主題:
在線閱讀:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
實物特徵
總結:This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear.