Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears

This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters o...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
主要な著者: Pathak, Sunil, Jain, Neelesh Kumar
フォーマット: 論文
言語:English
出版事項: EDP Sciences 2018
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
その他の書誌記述
要約:This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear.