Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study

Cognitive load is a theoretical notion having an increasingly influential role in the educational research areas that asserts that cognitive capacity in working memory is limited where too much load on the cognitive system may hamper the total learning process and learning outcome. Intrinsic cogniti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadia, Refat, Hafizoah, Kassim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Scientific Publisher 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20155/6/Impact%20of%20Extraneous%20Cognitive%20Load%20on%20Multimedia.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20155/
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.13018
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.13018
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.20155
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.201552019-08-28T07:34:36Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20155/ Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study Nadia, Refat Hafizoah, Kassim PE English QA Mathematics Cognitive load is a theoretical notion having an increasingly influential role in the educational research areas that asserts that cognitive capacity in working memory is limited where too much load on the cognitive system may hamper the total learning process and learning outcome. Intrinsic cognitive load, extrinsic load and germane cognitive load are three types of cognitive load. There is a strong link between extraneous cognitive load and instruction design which recognizes that learning materials can overload a learner’s cognitive effort. It has a negative influence on learning performance which has not been focused yet for multimedia based grammar learning. The present work thus sets out to explore how much difference occurs on human cognition with two different types of multimedia based instructions. To conduct the research, a quantitative research method was adopted with the use of two instruments (online test and NASA- TLX) to measure the impact (performance outcome and extraneous cognitive load) of the two type instructions on learners. The instruments are used with a view to 1) identify performance variation of the students on different tasks through online test 2) measure mental workload with NASA task load index. The findings revealed that the instructions with proper maintain principles of cognitive theory of multimedia learning have better performance and low cognitive overload on students than that of the instructions with violating the cognitive principles of multimedia learning. American Scientific Publisher 2018-11 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20155/6/Impact%20of%20Extraneous%20Cognitive%20Load%20on%20Multimedia.pdf Nadia, Refat and Hafizoah, Kassim (2018) Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study. Advanced Science Letters, 24 (10). pp. 7790-7794. ISSN 1936-6612 https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.13018 https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.13018
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic PE English
QA Mathematics
spellingShingle PE English
QA Mathematics
Nadia, Refat
Hafizoah, Kassim
Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study
description Cognitive load is a theoretical notion having an increasingly influential role in the educational research areas that asserts that cognitive capacity in working memory is limited where too much load on the cognitive system may hamper the total learning process and learning outcome. Intrinsic cognitive load, extrinsic load and germane cognitive load are three types of cognitive load. There is a strong link between extraneous cognitive load and instruction design which recognizes that learning materials can overload a learner’s cognitive effort. It has a negative influence on learning performance which has not been focused yet for multimedia based grammar learning. The present work thus sets out to explore how much difference occurs on human cognition with two different types of multimedia based instructions. To conduct the research, a quantitative research method was adopted with the use of two instruments (online test and NASA- TLX) to measure the impact (performance outcome and extraneous cognitive load) of the two type instructions on learners. The instruments are used with a view to 1) identify performance variation of the students on different tasks through online test 2) measure mental workload with NASA task load index. The findings revealed that the instructions with proper maintain principles of cognitive theory of multimedia learning have better performance and low cognitive overload on students than that of the instructions with violating the cognitive principles of multimedia learning.
format Article
author Nadia, Refat
Hafizoah, Kassim
author_facet Nadia, Refat
Hafizoah, Kassim
author_sort Nadia, Refat
title Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study
title_short Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study
title_full Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Extraneous Cognitive Load on Multimedia based Grammar Learning: A Comparative Study
title_sort impact of extraneous cognitive load on multimedia based grammar learning: a comparative study
publisher American Scientific Publisher
publishDate 2018
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20155/6/Impact%20of%20Extraneous%20Cognitive%20Load%20on%20Multimedia.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20155/
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.13018
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.13018
_version_ 1643668800589004800
score 13.15806