A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor
Long-term strength training programme are commonly constructed based on periodization models. The purpose of this study is to determine the more superior periodization model between; Linear Periodization (LP, n=20), Daily Undulating Periodization (DUP, n=19), and Weekly Undulating Periodization (WUP...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/99158/1/99158.pdf https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/99158/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uitm.ir.99158 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.uitm.ir.991582024-12-17T04:46:54Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/99158/ A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor Asmadi Mansor, Dina T Technology (General) Long-term strength training programme are commonly constructed based on periodization models. The purpose of this study is to determine the more superior periodization model between; Linear Periodization (LP, n=20), Daily Undulating Periodization (DUP, n=19), and Weekly Undulating Periodization (WUP, n=19) in improving maximal strength. Fifty eight (58) recreationally trained college-aged male participants (Age: 22±0.96 years; Height: 162.67±7.97 cm; Mass: 61.02±12.46 kg) with a minimum of 6 months strength training experience were assigned into three experimental groups. Pre and post-test measures used the Bench Press to record upper body strength and Leg Press for lower body strength. A nine (9) weeks exercise programme was implemented 3 days per week. Three (3) sets training for each exercise was prescribed. Training loads at 90% intensity of four (4) repetitions was determined as heavy, 85% intensity of six (6) repetitions for medium, and 80% of eight (8) repetitions as light. All groups showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) in the bench press test; 19.7% (LP), 29.1% (DUP), and 32% (WUP), and in the leg press test; 50.65% for LP, DUP at 49.6%, and WUP at 41%. Although the DUP showed the highest in overall strength improvement, statistical analysis however showed no significant differences existed between the groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, all the periodization models were effective to elicit higher strength gain with the DUP showing a slight superiority in overall percentage of improvement over LP and WUP. 2017 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/99158/1/99158.pdf A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor. (2017) Masters thesis, thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). <http://terminalib.uitm.edu.my/99158.pdf> |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Mara |
building |
Tun Abdul Razak Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Mara |
content_source |
UiTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
T Technology (General) |
spellingShingle |
T Technology (General) Asmadi Mansor, Dina A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor |
description |
Long-term strength training programme are commonly constructed based on periodization models. The purpose of this study is to determine the more superior periodization model between; Linear Periodization (LP, n=20), Daily Undulating Periodization (DUP, n=19), and Weekly Undulating Periodization (WUP, n=19) in improving maximal strength. Fifty eight (58) recreationally trained college-aged male participants (Age: 22±0.96 years; Height: 162.67±7.97 cm; Mass: 61.02±12.46 kg) with a minimum of 6 months strength training experience were assigned into three experimental groups. Pre and post-test measures used the Bench Press to record upper body strength and Leg Press for lower body strength. A nine (9) weeks exercise programme was implemented 3 days per week. Three (3) sets training for each exercise was prescribed. Training loads at 90% intensity of four (4) repetitions was determined as heavy, 85% intensity of six (6) repetitions for medium, and 80% of eight (8) repetitions as light. All groups showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) in the bench press test; 19.7% (LP), 29.1% (DUP), and 32% (WUP), and in the leg press test; 50.65% for LP, DUP at 49.6%, and WUP at 41%. Although the DUP showed the highest in overall strength improvement, statistical analysis however showed no significant differences existed between the groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, all the periodization models were effective to elicit higher strength gain with the DUP showing a slight superiority in overall percentage of improvement over LP and WUP. |
format |
Thesis |
author |
Asmadi Mansor, Dina |
author_facet |
Asmadi Mansor, Dina |
author_sort |
Asmadi Mansor, Dina |
title |
A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor |
title_short |
A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor |
title_full |
A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / Dina Asmadi Mansor |
title_sort |
comparison of periodization models for muscular strength / dina asmadi mansor |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/99158/1/99158.pdf https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/99158/ |
_version_ |
1818838311733559296 |
score |
13.222552 |