Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim

This study engaged the cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) to abstract the common errors in the learning of time intervals based on pupils’ knowledge states. CDA is a feasible testing tool that can inform us where a test taker may be prone to making errors in the tests. In this study, a cogniti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Phei, Ling Tan, Liew, Kee Kor, Chap, Sam Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kedah 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/30543/1/AJ_PHEI%20LING%20TAN%20CPLT%20K%2019.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/30543/
https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.30543
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.305432021-01-14T17:38:55Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/30543/ Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim Phei, Ling Tan Liew, Kee Kor Chap, Sam Lim Learning. Learning strategies Emotions and cognition This study engaged the cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) to abstract the common errors in the learning of time intervals based on pupils’ knowledge states. CDA is a feasible testing tool that can inform us where a test taker may be prone to making errors in the tests. In this study, a cognitive diagnostic model with six attributes and 12 test items was created to evaluate pupils’ performance in a diagnostic test on “duration of two inclusive dates”. A total of 269 primary six pupils from 11 elementary schools participated in the study. The diagnostic test scores were analyzed using the Artificial Neural Network which generated 12 knowledge states (KS). Result shows that “100000” was the leading KS. The common errors associated with this KS in hierarchical order of prominence were: (i) exclude starting date as a day in duration; (ii) error in regrouping; (iii) compute incorrectly the sum of the two given dates; and, (iv) express incorrectly the time measurement in months and days. These identified common errors would provide a valuable basis for remedial teaching of the topic “Time”. It also allows mathematics teachers to identify the inadequacy of an earlier teaching strategy and to engender an improved approach to help struggling learners shore up their basic skills. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kedah 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/30543/1/AJ_PHEI%20LING%20TAN%20CPLT%20K%2019.pdf Phei, Ling Tan and Liew, Kee Kor and Chap, Sam Lim (2019) Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 7 (1). pp. 3-10. ISSN 1823-464X https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Learning. Learning strategies
Emotions and cognition
spellingShingle Learning. Learning strategies
Emotions and cognition
Phei, Ling Tan
Liew, Kee Kor
Chap, Sam Lim
Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim
description This study engaged the cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) to abstract the common errors in the learning of time intervals based on pupils’ knowledge states. CDA is a feasible testing tool that can inform us where a test taker may be prone to making errors in the tests. In this study, a cognitive diagnostic model with six attributes and 12 test items was created to evaluate pupils’ performance in a diagnostic test on “duration of two inclusive dates”. A total of 269 primary six pupils from 11 elementary schools participated in the study. The diagnostic test scores were analyzed using the Artificial Neural Network which generated 12 knowledge states (KS). Result shows that “100000” was the leading KS. The common errors associated with this KS in hierarchical order of prominence were: (i) exclude starting date as a day in duration; (ii) error in regrouping; (iii) compute incorrectly the sum of the two given dates; and, (iv) express incorrectly the time measurement in months and days. These identified common errors would provide a valuable basis for remedial teaching of the topic “Time”. It also allows mathematics teachers to identify the inadequacy of an earlier teaching strategy and to engender an improved approach to help struggling learners shore up their basic skills.
format Article
author Phei, Ling Tan
Liew, Kee Kor
Chap, Sam Lim
author_facet Phei, Ling Tan
Liew, Kee Kor
Chap, Sam Lim
author_sort Phei, Ling Tan
title Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim
title_short Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim
title_full Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim
title_fullStr Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim
title_full_unstemmed Abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / Phei-Ling Tan, Liew-Kee Kor and Chap-Sam Lim
title_sort abstracting common errors in the learning of time intervals via cognitive diagnostic assessment / phei-ling tan, liew-kee kor and chap-sam lim
publisher Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kedah
publishDate 2019
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/30543/1/AJ_PHEI%20LING%20TAN%20CPLT%20K%2019.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/30543/
https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/
_version_ 1690374223602647040
score 13.160551