Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali
For over 25 years, organizations have used Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) systems to handle business transaction. However, EDI is neither cheap nor simple and is based on private network such as Value Added Network (VAN) .It forces organization into long term, tightly coupled trading relations...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Student Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/1457/1/PPb_FITRI%20ASRAH%20RAZALI%20CS%2007_5%20P01.pdf http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/1457/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uitm.ir.1457 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.uitm.ir.14572019-08-15T07:28:48Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/1457/ Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali Razali, Fitriasrah Electronic Computers. Computer Science For over 25 years, organizations have used Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) systems to handle business transaction. However, EDI is neither cheap nor simple and is based on private network such as Value Added Network (VAN) .It forces organization into long term, tightly coupled trading relationship with their business partners. EDI also does not stand for free exchanging infomnation and transaction. As e-Business frameworks have evolved from traditional EDI technology to Internet using EDI, it is still not mature enough to allow their broad successful commercial application. All these approaches lack substantial reflection and integration of business semantic as the basic of any electronic commerce partnership. ebXML is a world-wide initiative that tries to solve drawbacks of existing standard and approaches and has the potential to successfully delivery solutions to these problems. Therefore, in this paper, researcher is trying to compare both applications respectively. The comparison will be based on criterion with regard to business architecture since this work focus on B2B application. Researcher gathers information by having an inten/iew with an expert in this field instead make critical analysis based on previous journals and other studies. As a result, EDI is obviously stay back behind the ebXML as it can also fulfill the functionality of EDI and developed based on the investment in and experiences of EDI. Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences 2007 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/1457/1/PPb_FITRI%20ASRAH%20RAZALI%20CS%2007_5%20P01.pdf Razali, Fitriasrah (2007) Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali. [Student Project] (Submitted) |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Mara |
building |
Tun Abdul Razak Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Mara |
content_source |
UiTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
Electronic Computers. Computer Science |
spellingShingle |
Electronic Computers. Computer Science Razali, Fitriasrah Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali |
description |
For over 25 years, organizations have used Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) systems
to handle business transaction. However, EDI is neither cheap nor simple and is based
on private network such as Value Added Network (VAN) .It forces organization into long
term, tightly coupled trading relationship with their business partners. EDI also does not
stand for free exchanging infomnation and transaction. As e-Business frameworks have
evolved from traditional EDI technology to Internet using EDI, it is still not mature
enough to allow their broad successful commercial application. All these approaches
lack substantial reflection and integration of business semantic as the basic of any
electronic commerce partnership. ebXML is a world-wide initiative that tries to solve
drawbacks of existing standard and approaches and has the potential to successfully
delivery solutions to these problems. Therefore, in this paper, researcher is trying to
compare both applications respectively. The comparison will be based on criterion with
regard to business architecture since this work focus on B2B application. Researcher
gathers information by having an inten/iew with an expert in this field instead make
critical analysis based on previous journals and other studies. As a result, EDI is
obviously stay back behind the ebXML as it can also fulfill the functionality of EDI and
developed based on the investment in and experiences of EDI. |
format |
Student Project |
author |
Razali, Fitriasrah |
author_facet |
Razali, Fitriasrah |
author_sort |
Razali, Fitriasrah |
title |
Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali |
title_short |
Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali |
title_full |
Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali |
title_fullStr |
Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparisons between EDI and ebXML Architecture in Business to Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce (EC) / Fitriasrah Razali |
title_sort |
comparisons between edi and ebxml architecture in business to business (b2b) electronic commerce (ec) / fitriasrah razali |
publisher |
Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/1457/1/PPb_FITRI%20ASRAH%20RAZALI%20CS%2007_5%20P01.pdf http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/1457/ |
_version_ |
1685648145836408832 |
score |
13.214268 |