Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring

Development of computational thinking (CT) covers a broad range of skills, as exemplified by diverse CT definitions and assessments. There are however, less research on developing computational perspectives. We aim to investigate how to develop computational perspectives, critical to creativity and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Chien Sing *, Wong, Daniel K.
Other Authors: Rodrigo, Maria Mercedes T.
Format: Book Section
Published: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/2298/
https://icce2021.apsce.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ICCE2021-Vol.II-PP.-456-461.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.sunway.eprints.2298
record_format eprints
spelling my.sunway.eprints.22982023-06-28T10:55:43Z http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/2298/ Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring Lee, Chien Sing * Wong, Daniel K. QA76 Computer software Development of computational thinking (CT) covers a broad range of skills, as exemplified by diverse CT definitions and assessments. There are however, less research on developing computational perspectives. We aim to investigate how to develop computational perspectives, critical to creativity and innovation, within the Interest-Driven Creator (IDC) theory, which espouses constructivist/constructionist tenets. This paper reviews the foundational works on design thinking, computational thinking and creativity. We then analyse examples in computing and information systems, and one in the creative industries, to derive pedagogical-socio-technological insights. We find that non-Scratch projects, will benefit from framing, via diverse human-computer interaction (HCI) design grand challenges and task refactoring. We also find that designing based on goal-based scenarios, and strategic knowledge, with scalability and extensibility in mind, e.g., via Alexandrian architectural patterns, and logical flow of information, will extend association to aggregation (abstraction). This is followed by refactoring and/or permutations at different levels of granularity. We also find that Scratch’s diversity and underlying design thinking-CT/data science-participatory knowledge management design are critical to non-Scratch CT projects’ success. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education Rodrigo, Maria Mercedes T. Iyer, Sridhar Mitrovic, Antonjia 2021-11-22 Book Section PeerReviewed Lee, Chien Sing * and Wong, Daniel K. (2021) Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring. In: ICCE 2021 - 29th International Conference on Computers in Education Workshop Proceedings. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Taiwan, pp. 456-461. ISBN 9789869721479 https://icce2021.apsce.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ICCE2021-Vol.II-PP.-456-461.pdf
institution Sunway University
building Sunway Campus Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Sunway University
content_source Sunway Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/
topic QA76 Computer software
spellingShingle QA76 Computer software
Lee, Chien Sing *
Wong, Daniel K.
Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring
description Development of computational thinking (CT) covers a broad range of skills, as exemplified by diverse CT definitions and assessments. There are however, less research on developing computational perspectives. We aim to investigate how to develop computational perspectives, critical to creativity and innovation, within the Interest-Driven Creator (IDC) theory, which espouses constructivist/constructionist tenets. This paper reviews the foundational works on design thinking, computational thinking and creativity. We then analyse examples in computing and information systems, and one in the creative industries, to derive pedagogical-socio-technological insights. We find that non-Scratch projects, will benefit from framing, via diverse human-computer interaction (HCI) design grand challenges and task refactoring. We also find that designing based on goal-based scenarios, and strategic knowledge, with scalability and extensibility in mind, e.g., via Alexandrian architectural patterns, and logical flow of information, will extend association to aggregation (abstraction). This is followed by refactoring and/or permutations at different levels of granularity. We also find that Scratch’s diversity and underlying design thinking-CT/data science-participatory knowledge management design are critical to non-Scratch CT projects’ success.
author2 Rodrigo, Maria Mercedes T.
author_facet Rodrigo, Maria Mercedes T.
Lee, Chien Sing *
Wong, Daniel K.
format Book Section
author Lee, Chien Sing *
Wong, Daniel K.
author_sort Lee, Chien Sing *
title Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring
title_short Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring
title_full Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring
title_fullStr Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Computational Thinking in Scratch and Non-Scratch Web Design Projects: A MetaAnalysis on Framing and Refactoring
title_sort comparing computational thinking in scratch and non-scratch web design projects: a metaanalysis on framing and refactoring
publisher Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/2298/
https://icce2021.apsce.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ICCE2021-Vol.II-PP.-456-461.pdf
_version_ 1770554559870009344
score 13.211869