Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery

The research focuses on the comparison of students’ learning experience between usage of physical models and Augmented Reality (AR) models of Islamic Heritage at Heritage Studies Gallery. Currently, the gallery has embedded mobile AR technologies as an alternative in collecting, and displaying the l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin, Abdullah, Fadzidah, Denan, Zuraini, Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/1/P_VS_AR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/4/50682_tentative.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/
https://icoed.org/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.50682
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.506822018-05-23T02:14:01Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/ Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin Abdullah, Fadzidah Denan, Zuraini Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker L Education (General) NA Architecture The research focuses on the comparison of students’ learning experience between usage of physical models and Augmented Reality (AR) models of Islamic Heritage at Heritage Studies Gallery. Currently, the gallery has embedded mobile AR technologies as an alternative in collecting, and displaying the learning content. These mobile AR technologies work as a medium of interaction between the students and learning content. AR models are not going to replace the roles of physical models, but they are used to assist students’ learning by utilising 3D visualizing media especially for Islamic architectural heritage. Thus, the objective of this study is to compare the students’ perceptions of their learning experience between utilising physical models versus using AR models of Islamic Architectural Heritage. The research applied qualitative-quantitative mixed research approach, where the observation through video camera and questionnaires are used to obtain primary data. The survey on the students’ perception would be collected right after the students experience the learning process at the gallery. It is anticipated that AR models is preferable as compared to physical models in the context of the gallery display for learning experience. The reflection of this research, highlight the role of both learning objects as learning components that offer learning impact to the student learning experience. 2016-04-12 Conference or Workshop Item REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/1/P_VS_AR.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/4/50682_tentative.pdf Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin and Abdullah, Fadzidah and Denan, Zuraini and Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker (2016) Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery. In: 2016 International Conference on Education (ICOED), 12th-14th April 2016, Kelapa Gading, Jakarta. (Unpublished) https://icoed.org/
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic L Education (General)
NA Architecture
spellingShingle L Education (General)
NA Architecture
Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
Abdullah, Fadzidah
Denan, Zuraini
Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
description The research focuses on the comparison of students’ learning experience between usage of physical models and Augmented Reality (AR) models of Islamic Heritage at Heritage Studies Gallery. Currently, the gallery has embedded mobile AR technologies as an alternative in collecting, and displaying the learning content. These mobile AR technologies work as a medium of interaction between the students and learning content. AR models are not going to replace the roles of physical models, but they are used to assist students’ learning by utilising 3D visualizing media especially for Islamic architectural heritage. Thus, the objective of this study is to compare the students’ perceptions of their learning experience between utilising physical models versus using AR models of Islamic Architectural Heritage. The research applied qualitative-quantitative mixed research approach, where the observation through video camera and questionnaires are used to obtain primary data. The survey on the students’ perception would be collected right after the students experience the learning process at the gallery. It is anticipated that AR models is preferable as compared to physical models in the context of the gallery display for learning experience. The reflection of this research, highlight the role of both learning objects as learning components that offer learning impact to the student learning experience.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
Abdullah, Fadzidah
Denan, Zuraini
Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
author_facet Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
Abdullah, Fadzidah
Denan, Zuraini
Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
author_sort Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
title Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_short Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_full Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_fullStr Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_full_unstemmed Physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_sort physical vs augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
publishDate 2016
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/1/P_VS_AR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/4/50682_tentative.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/50682/
https://icoed.org/
_version_ 1643613787047067648
score 13.160551