Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars

This study aims to compare the prominent sources and scholars’ statements in this science (Pausing and beginning) in order to know the difference between the terms, and to highlight conditions of agreement and disagreement among scholars. The focus is, also, to uncover the most prominent terms and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Halabi, Omaimah Abdulrahman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/1/Islamiyyat_46_1_11.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/islamiyyat/issue/view/1700
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.24157
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.241572024-09-13T08:52:07Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/ Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars Halabi, Omaimah Abdulrahman This study aims to compare the prominent sources and scholars’ statements in this science (Pausing and beginning) in order to know the difference between the terms, and to highlight conditions of agreement and disagreement among scholars. The focus is, also, to uncover the most prominent terms and their meanings seen individually by the scholars whose books are under consideration in this study. The importance lies in revealing the literal meaning and uses of the term by ‘Pausing’ scholars, primarily Al-Dani in his book ‘Sufficient’ and the reasons behind his selection of the term, and how concordant or contradictory he is with five of ‘Stopping’ scholars. These aims are achieved through inductive study and analytical comparison. The study revealed that there were 32 issues pointed out in ‘Good Stopping’ and 6 issues in Al-Anbari. However, Al-Ashmuni ‘Beginning’. agreed Ther with e were 14 Al-Dani issues on 5 issues, Al-Omani on 4 and Al-Sajawandi and Ibn Al-Nahhas exclusive to Al-Dani and 18 issues where he agreed with on one issue, while comparing Al-Dani with the five well-known books on ‘Good Pause’, it appeared that they were in agreement on (denotation) but in disagreement on (connotation). Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/1/Islamiyyat_46_1_11.pdf Halabi, Omaimah Abdulrahman (2024) Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars. Islamiyyat : Jurnal Antarabangsa Pengajian Islam; International Journal of Islamic Studies, 46 (1). pp. 143-152. ISSN 0216-5636 https://ejournal.ukm.my/islamiyyat/issue/view/1700
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description This study aims to compare the prominent sources and scholars’ statements in this science (Pausing and beginning) in order to know the difference between the terms, and to highlight conditions of agreement and disagreement among scholars. The focus is, also, to uncover the most prominent terms and their meanings seen individually by the scholars whose books are under consideration in this study. The importance lies in revealing the literal meaning and uses of the term by ‘Pausing’ scholars, primarily Al-Dani in his book ‘Sufficient’ and the reasons behind his selection of the term, and how concordant or contradictory he is with five of ‘Stopping’ scholars. These aims are achieved through inductive study and analytical comparison. The study revealed that there were 32 issues pointed out in ‘Good Stopping’ and 6 issues in Al-Anbari. However, Al-Ashmuni ‘Beginning’. agreed Ther with e were 14 Al-Dani issues on 5 issues, Al-Omani on 4 and Al-Sajawandi and Ibn Al-Nahhas exclusive to Al-Dani and 18 issues where he agreed with on one issue, while comparing Al-Dani with the five well-known books on ‘Good Pause’, it appeared that they were in agreement on (denotation) but in disagreement on (connotation).
format Article
author Halabi, Omaimah Abdulrahman
spellingShingle Halabi, Omaimah Abdulrahman
Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
author_facet Halabi, Omaimah Abdulrahman
author_sort Halabi, Omaimah Abdulrahman
title Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
title_short Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
title_full Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
title_sort comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2024
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/1/Islamiyyat_46_1_11.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/islamiyyat/issue/view/1700
_version_ 1811683412304461824
score 13.23648