Comparative analysis of quranic recitation: investigating the “good pause” conditions among leading scholars
This study aims to compare the prominent sources and scholars’ statements in this science (Pausing and beginning) in order to know the difference between the terms, and to highlight conditions of agreement and disagreement among scholars. The focus is, also, to uncover the most prominent terms and...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2024
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/1/Islamiyyat_46_1_11.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24157/ https://ejournal.ukm.my/islamiyyat/issue/view/1700 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study aims to compare the prominent sources and scholars’ statements in this science (Pausing and beginning)
in order to know the difference between the terms, and to highlight conditions of agreement and disagreement among scholars. The focus is, also, to uncover the most prominent terms and their meanings seen individually by the scholars
whose books are under consideration in this study. The importance lies in revealing the literal meaning and uses of the term by ‘Pausing’ scholars, primarily Al-Dani in his book ‘Sufficient’ and the reasons behind his selection
of the term, and how concordant or contradictory he is with five of ‘Stopping’ scholars. These aims are achieved
through inductive study and analytical comparison. The study revealed that there were 32 issues pointed out in ‘Good
Stopping’ and 6 issues in Al-Anbari. However, Al-Ashmuni ‘Beginning’. agreed Ther with e were 14 Al-Dani issues on 5 issues, Al-Omani on 4 and Al-Sajawandi and Ibn Al-Nahhas exclusive to Al-Dani and 18 issues where he agreed with
on one issue, while comparing Al-Dani with the five well-known books on ‘Good Pause’, it appeared that they were in
agreement on (denotation) but in disagreement on (connotation). |
|---|