Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy

This study deals with the problem of ambivalence at the semantic level of word meaning. We argue that semantic ambivalence determines the whole structure of polysemy of certain English words and propose a method of establishing contextual markers indicating the presence of semantic ambivalence as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smirnova, Alexandra, Tolochin, Igor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2018
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/1/24720-82988-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1098
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.17613
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.176132021-11-22T06:19:01Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/ Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy Smirnova, Alexandra Tolochin, Igor This study deals with the problem of ambivalence at the semantic level of word meaning. We argue that semantic ambivalence determines the whole structure of polysemy of certain English words and propose a method of establishing contextual markers indicating the presence of semantic ambivalence as the essential element of word meaning. Having studied a large variety of contexts for the word ‘angel’, we have identified three typical collocational patterns of its use in texts. Therefore, we suggest that this word has three main senses that are distinguished by their evaluative properties: ambivalent, positive and negative. In the ambivalent type of context ‘angel’ collocates with both positively and negatively charged words at the same time, which creates verbal sequences of high emotional tension. This fact proves the idea that certain words in the English language can convey simultaneously positive and negative aspects of human experience in a particular type of their usage as intrinsically inseparable from each other. Ambivalent word senses are referred to as archetypes, for they represent the legacy of the archaic syncretism of the human mind, which has been handed down to us in religion and poetry. Most modern monolingual English dictionaries do not take into account the distinction in the evaluative characteristics of collocational patterns when defining the word ‘angel’. This leads to a number of problems in their lexicographic descriptions of this word. Taking into account its semantic ambivalence would contribute to a more coherent picture of its sense structure. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2018-08 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/1/24720-82988-1-PB.pdf Smirnova, Alexandra and Tolochin, Igor (2018) Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy. GEMA ; Online Journal of Language Studies, 18 (3). pp. 153-169. ISSN 1675-8021 https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1098
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description This study deals with the problem of ambivalence at the semantic level of word meaning. We argue that semantic ambivalence determines the whole structure of polysemy of certain English words and propose a method of establishing contextual markers indicating the presence of semantic ambivalence as the essential element of word meaning. Having studied a large variety of contexts for the word ‘angel’, we have identified three typical collocational patterns of its use in texts. Therefore, we suggest that this word has three main senses that are distinguished by their evaluative properties: ambivalent, positive and negative. In the ambivalent type of context ‘angel’ collocates with both positively and negatively charged words at the same time, which creates verbal sequences of high emotional tension. This fact proves the idea that certain words in the English language can convey simultaneously positive and negative aspects of human experience in a particular type of their usage as intrinsically inseparable from each other. Ambivalent word senses are referred to as archetypes, for they represent the legacy of the archaic syncretism of the human mind, which has been handed down to us in religion and poetry. Most modern monolingual English dictionaries do not take into account the distinction in the evaluative characteristics of collocational patterns when defining the word ‘angel’. This leads to a number of problems in their lexicographic descriptions of this word. Taking into account its semantic ambivalence would contribute to a more coherent picture of its sense structure.
format Article
author Smirnova, Alexandra
Tolochin, Igor
spellingShingle Smirnova, Alexandra
Tolochin, Igor
Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
author_facet Smirnova, Alexandra
Tolochin, Igor
author_sort Smirnova, Alexandra
title Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
title_short Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
title_full Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
title_fullStr Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
title_full_unstemmed Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
title_sort terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2018
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/1/24720-82988-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1098
_version_ 1718927136212910080
score 13.188404