Terrible angels : semantic ambivalence and polysemy
This study deals with the problem of ambivalence at the semantic level of word meaning. We argue that semantic ambivalence determines the whole structure of polysemy of certain English words and propose a method of establishing contextual markers indicating the presence of semantic ambivalence as...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2018
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/1/24720-82988-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17613/ https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1098 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study deals with the problem of ambivalence at the semantic level of word meaning. We
argue that semantic ambivalence determines the whole structure of polysemy of certain
English words and propose a method of establishing contextual markers indicating the
presence of semantic ambivalence as the essential element of word meaning. Having studied
a large variety of contexts for the word ‘angel’, we have identified three typical collocational
patterns of its use in texts. Therefore, we suggest that this word has three main senses that are
distinguished by their evaluative properties: ambivalent, positive and negative. In the
ambivalent type of context ‘angel’ collocates with both positively and negatively charged
words at the same time, which creates verbal sequences of high emotional tension. This fact
proves the idea that certain words in the English language can convey simultaneously
positive and negative aspects of human experience in a particular type of their usage as
intrinsically inseparable from each other. Ambivalent word senses are referred to as
archetypes, for they represent the legacy of the archaic syncretism of the human mind, which
has been handed down to us in religion and poetry. Most modern monolingual English
dictionaries do not take into account the distinction in the evaluative characteristics of
collocational patterns when defining the word ‘angel’. This leads to a number of problems in
their lexicographic descriptions of this word. Taking into account its semantic ambivalence
would contribute to a more coherent picture of its sense structure. |
---|