Reflectance characteristics of silicon surface fabricated with the arrays of uniform inverted pyramid microstructures in UV-visible range

In this paper, inverted pyramidal microstructures are designed and fabricated on silicon (Si) surface. The characteristics of surface reflectance are simulated using two-dimensional (2D) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method by varying the spacing (S) and width (W) of the pyramidal microstruct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Faizol Abdullah,, Abdul Manaf Hashim,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13707/1/02%20Mohd%20Faizol%20Abdullah.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/13707/
http://www.ukm.my/jsm/malay_journals/jilid48bil6_2019/KandunganJilid48Bil6_2019.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, inverted pyramidal microstructures are designed and fabricated on silicon (Si) surface. The characteristics of surface reflectance are simulated using two-dimensional (2D) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method by varying the spacing (S) and width (W) of the pyramidal microstructures. The results showed that the effect of S is more significant compared to W where the reflectance of the irradiated light has been increased gradually with the increase of S from 0 to 3 μm, and the difference is around 9.6%. Due to the etching constraint, S= 3 μm is chosen for the fabrication. Textured structure is fabricated by the anisotropic etching of tetramethyl-ammonium hydroxide (TMAH) with additional of isopropyl alcohol (IPA). Long etching time of 120 min is required to form uniform arrays of pyramidal microstructures with smooth and well-terminated four sidewalls at (111) plane. Due to the undercut etching under SiO2 mask, it results to the formation of slightly larger W and smaller S in the fabricated structures. The measured average reflectance in UV-visible range for the Si with inverted pyramidal microstructures is very low down to 10.4%. The discrepancy between the measured and simulated values is speculated to be due to the use of 2D FDTD instead of three-dimensional (3D) FDTD.