Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives

Fundamental rights in Malaysia enjoys a constitutional protection and has been arguably well-guarded by an independent judiciary. Article 11(1) (a) of the Federal Constitution provides for freedom to choose one’s own faith or religious believe even though not in absolute terms. Existing legal restri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad, Rusniah, Halim, Rohizan, Abdul Rahman, Rohana, Romli, Fariza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31193/1/JCR%2007%2008%202020%201725-1728.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.01
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31193/
https://www.jcreview.com/
http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.01
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.31193
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.311932024-08-04T04:33:57Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31193/ Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives Ahmad, Rusniah Halim, Rohizan Abdul Rahman, Rohana Romli, Fariza K Law (General) Fundamental rights in Malaysia enjoys a constitutional protection and has been arguably well-guarded by an independent judiciary. Article 11(1) (a) of the Federal Constitution provides for freedom to choose one’s own faith or religious believe even though not in absolute terms. Existing legal restrictions to the enjoyment of this right has never deterred the courts from its noble duty of scrutinizing executive and ministerial action which has impacted the fundamental rights of the people. The emergence of new technology inevitably demands more attention from the judiciary as fundamental rights widens and comfortably give citizens access to more information and expands their legal awareness to new frontiers. Generally, freedom to choose one’s own religion is a right protected under freedom of religion clause constitutionally provided by countries to its citizen. Whether the right is absolute or qualified depend upon legal background and history of that country. In Malaysia, Article 11 of the Federal Constitution was given numerous interpretations by writers, scholars as well as the judiciary on whether the right is absolute or qualified. This paper analyzes decided cases by the Civil Courts and also the Syariah Court. By analyzing decided cases, the tendency of the courts in interpreting Article 11 and also the nature of rights given to Malaysian Citizens in choosing religious belief could be understood. The situation in Malaysia is different because our legal system comprises the civil law as well as Syariah law applicable only to Muslims. Hence, the hurdle in choosing religious affiliation only applies to Muslims and not for other religious adherence Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd 2020 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31193/1/JCR%2007%2008%202020%201725-1728.pdf Ahmad, Rusniah and Halim, Rohizan and Abdul Rahman, Rohana and Romli, Fariza (2020) Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (8). pp. 1725-1728. ISSN 2394-5125 https://www.jcreview.com/ http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.01 http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.01
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Ahmad, Rusniah
Halim, Rohizan
Abdul Rahman, Rohana
Romli, Fariza
Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives
description Fundamental rights in Malaysia enjoys a constitutional protection and has been arguably well-guarded by an independent judiciary. Article 11(1) (a) of the Federal Constitution provides for freedom to choose one’s own faith or religious believe even though not in absolute terms. Existing legal restrictions to the enjoyment of this right has never deterred the courts from its noble duty of scrutinizing executive and ministerial action which has impacted the fundamental rights of the people. The emergence of new technology inevitably demands more attention from the judiciary as fundamental rights widens and comfortably give citizens access to more information and expands their legal awareness to new frontiers. Generally, freedom to choose one’s own religion is a right protected under freedom of religion clause constitutionally provided by countries to its citizen. Whether the right is absolute or qualified depend upon legal background and history of that country. In Malaysia, Article 11 of the Federal Constitution was given numerous interpretations by writers, scholars as well as the judiciary on whether the right is absolute or qualified. This paper analyzes decided cases by the Civil Courts and also the Syariah Court. By analyzing decided cases, the tendency of the courts in interpreting Article 11 and also the nature of rights given to Malaysian Citizens in choosing religious belief could be understood. The situation in Malaysia is different because our legal system comprises the civil law as well as Syariah law applicable only to Muslims. Hence, the hurdle in choosing religious affiliation only applies to Muslims and not for other religious adherence
format Article
author Ahmad, Rusniah
Halim, Rohizan
Abdul Rahman, Rohana
Romli, Fariza
author_facet Ahmad, Rusniah
Halim, Rohizan
Abdul Rahman, Rohana
Romli, Fariza
author_sort Ahmad, Rusniah
title Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives
title_short Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives
title_full Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives
title_fullStr Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Freedom to Choose Religious Faith in Malaysia: Judicial Perspectives
title_sort freedom to choose religious faith in malaysia: judicial perspectives
publisher Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd
publishDate 2020
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31193/1/JCR%2007%2008%202020%201725-1728.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.01
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31193/
https://www.jcreview.com/
http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.01
_version_ 1806452638208753664
score 13.18916