Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia

The paper reviews on two challenges of a whistleblower in disclosing information on wrongdoing under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA 2010) in Malaysia. Two elements regarding the definition of whistleblower under the act has become obstacles for a whistleblower to expose the misconduct. The f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Ali @ Ramli, Azlin Namili, A. Rahman, Aspalella, Yaacob, Nurli
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31160/1/UUMILC%202018%2052%2001%20775-780.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31160/
https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.78
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.31160
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.311602024-07-29T09:08:41Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31160/ Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia Mohd Ali @ Ramli, Azlin Namili A. Rahman, Aspalella Yaacob, Nurli K Law (General) The paper reviews on two challenges of a whistleblower in disclosing information on wrongdoing under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA 2010) in Malaysia. Two elements regarding the definition of whistleblower under the act has become obstacles for a whistleblower to expose the misconduct. The first element obliged the wrongdoing to be exposed only through enforcement agencies despite the agencies are considered among the corrupt institutions in Malaysia. The second element required that the wrongdoing does not come under the purview of any written law regardless if the wrongdoing is against public policy. Additionally, this paper used the analytical and comparative legal research method where some statutes and decided cases were analyze in order to identify the problems, examine the merits and bring improvements to the definition concerned. The findings shows that a whistleblower will not be protected under WPA 2010 if he goes against the two criteria’s of the definition above , instead he can be charged for breaching the above criterias 2018 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by_nc_nd https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31160/1/UUMILC%202018%2052%2001%20775-780.pdf Mohd Ali @ Ramli, Azlin Namili and A. Rahman, Aspalella and Yaacob, Nurli (2018) Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia. In: The 9th UUM International Legal Conference 2017: Law, Justice and Integrity, 23-24 September 2017, EDC Hotels and Resort, UUM Sintok,Kedah. https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.78
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Mohd Ali @ Ramli, Azlin Namili
A. Rahman, Aspalella
Yaacob, Nurli
Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia
description The paper reviews on two challenges of a whistleblower in disclosing information on wrongdoing under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA 2010) in Malaysia. Two elements regarding the definition of whistleblower under the act has become obstacles for a whistleblower to expose the misconduct. The first element obliged the wrongdoing to be exposed only through enforcement agencies despite the agencies are considered among the corrupt institutions in Malaysia. The second element required that the wrongdoing does not come under the purview of any written law regardless if the wrongdoing is against public policy. Additionally, this paper used the analytical and comparative legal research method where some statutes and decided cases were analyze in order to identify the problems, examine the merits and bring improvements to the definition concerned. The findings shows that a whistleblower will not be protected under WPA 2010 if he goes against the two criteria’s of the definition above , instead he can be charged for breaching the above criterias
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Mohd Ali @ Ramli, Azlin Namili
A. Rahman, Aspalella
Yaacob, Nurli
author_facet Mohd Ali @ Ramli, Azlin Namili
A. Rahman, Aspalella
Yaacob, Nurli
author_sort Mohd Ali @ Ramli, Azlin Namili
title Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia
title_short Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia
title_full Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia
title_fullStr Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Combating Corruption: The Two Challenges under Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 of Malaysia
title_sort combating corruption: the two challenges under whistleblower protection act 2010 of malaysia
publishDate 2018
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31160/1/UUMILC%202018%2052%2001%20775-780.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31160/
https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.78
_version_ 1805893245370105856
score 13.188404