The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich?

The growth of illicit enrichment crime or living beyond one’s means is a significant challenge in combating corruption. Many countries have shown their commitment towards preventing illicit enrichment crimes by criminalising and penalising illicit enrichment in their laws, including Hong Kong and S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Azman Ng, Noratikah, Ayub, Zainal Amin, Abdul Rahman, Rohana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29103/1/UUMJLS%2013%2002%202022%20267-293.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29103/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15297
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.29103
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.291032023-02-12T08:16:33Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29103/ The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich? Muhammad Azman Ng, Noratikah Ayub, Zainal Amin Abdul Rahman, Rohana K Law (General) The growth of illicit enrichment crime or living beyond one’s means is a significant challenge in combating corruption. Many countries have shown their commitment towards preventing illicit enrichment crimes by criminalising and penalising illicit enrichment in their laws, including Hong Kong and Singapore. Illicit enrichment is a crime and Malaysia has no clear provisions on illicit enrichment to prevent it. Therefore, this paper analysed the adequacy of Section 36 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 [Act 694] (MACC Act 2009). The legal framework on illicit enrichment in Hong Kong and Singapore were referred as sources of critique. To achieve the said objective, this study adopted a doctrinal approach using qualitative research methodology. The scope of the paper is limited due to the inadequacy and indirectness of the law on illicit enrichment in Malaysia. This paper critically analysed the international framework of illicit enrichment and conducted a comparative analysis of the law in Hong Kong and Singapore, namely the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960, respectively. In conclusion, this paper found that the current law in Malaysia is inadequate and Malaysia can learn to adopt the said laws as provided in Hong Kong and Singapore. This study serves as a guide for legislators intending to address the current inadequacies of the law on corruption in Malaysia, equipped with better knowledge on the characteristics of illicit enrichment. Suggestions to address the issues are proposed. UUM Press 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29103/1/UUMJLS%2013%2002%202022%20267-293.pdf Muhammad Azman Ng, Noratikah and Ayub, Zainal Amin and Abdul Rahman, Rohana (2022) The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich? UUM Journal of Legal Studies (UUMJLS), 13 (2). pp. 267-293. ISSN 2229-984X https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15297 https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11 https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Muhammad Azman Ng, Noratikah
Ayub, Zainal Amin
Abdul Rahman, Rohana
The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich?
description The growth of illicit enrichment crime or living beyond one’s means is a significant challenge in combating corruption. Many countries have shown their commitment towards preventing illicit enrichment crimes by criminalising and penalising illicit enrichment in their laws, including Hong Kong and Singapore. Illicit enrichment is a crime and Malaysia has no clear provisions on illicit enrichment to prevent it. Therefore, this paper analysed the adequacy of Section 36 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 [Act 694] (MACC Act 2009). The legal framework on illicit enrichment in Hong Kong and Singapore were referred as sources of critique. To achieve the said objective, this study adopted a doctrinal approach using qualitative research methodology. The scope of the paper is limited due to the inadequacy and indirectness of the law on illicit enrichment in Malaysia. This paper critically analysed the international framework of illicit enrichment and conducted a comparative analysis of the law in Hong Kong and Singapore, namely the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960, respectively. In conclusion, this paper found that the current law in Malaysia is inadequate and Malaysia can learn to adopt the said laws as provided in Hong Kong and Singapore. This study serves as a guide for legislators intending to address the current inadequacies of the law on corruption in Malaysia, equipped with better knowledge on the characteristics of illicit enrichment. Suggestions to address the issues are proposed.
format Article
author Muhammad Azman Ng, Noratikah
Ayub, Zainal Amin
Abdul Rahman, Rohana
author_facet Muhammad Azman Ng, Noratikah
Ayub, Zainal Amin
Abdul Rahman, Rohana
author_sort Muhammad Azman Ng, Noratikah
title The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich?
title_short The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich?
title_full The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich?
title_fullStr The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich?
title_full_unstemmed The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich?
title_sort legal aspect of illicit enrichment in malaysia: is it a crime to be rich?
publisher UUM Press
publishDate 2022
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29103/1/UUMJLS%2013%2002%202022%20267-293.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29103/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15297
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11
_version_ 1758580953824886784
score 13.188404