The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students

The purpose of the study is to identify the differences of fitness profile between students with hearing impairment and students with visual impairment at secondary schools. A number of 62 subjects from two types of disabilities with 30 students who have hearing impairment (male = 21; female = 9) an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah, Nagoor Meera, Mohamed, Mawarni, Tumijan, Wahidah, Parnabas, Vincent, Ponnusamy, Vellapandian, Mohamed Shapie, Mohamed Nizam, Omar Fauzee, Mohd Sofian
Other Authors: Ismail, Shariman Ismadi
Format: Book Section
Published: Springer 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/26319/
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-691-1_22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.26319
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.263192019-08-28T01:59:35Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/26319/ The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students Abdullah, Nagoor Meera Mohamed, Mawarni Tumijan, Wahidah Parnabas, Vincent Ponnusamy, Vellapandian Mohamed Shapie, Mohamed Nizam Omar Fauzee, Mohd Sofian L Education (General) The purpose of the study is to identify the differences of fitness profile between students with hearing impairment and students with visual impairment at secondary schools. A number of 62 subjects from two types of disabilities with 30 students who have hearing impairment (male = 21; female = 9) and 32 students with visual impairment (male = 18; female = 14) voluntarily participated in the study. A fitness profile was determined to identify the fitness level between two types of disabilities. Seven fitness tests were conducted on both groups such as 1600-m run test, 10-m agility run test, standing broad jump test, vertical jump test, handgrip strength test, sit and reach test, and sit-up test. The findings showed that students who are visually impaired performed better in sit-up test (36.50 ± 11.02), 1600-m run test (11.53 ± 2.26), and sit and reach test (31.09 ± 5.04) and students with hearing impairment performed better in handgrip strength test (right hand 29.27 ± 10.57) (left hand 27.48 ± 9.55), standing broad jump test (176.03 ± 43.26), and vertical jump test (40.00 ± 12.81) but with both groups showed similar strength in agility test. There was a significant difference in the sit-up test between two groups (0.0000, p ˃ 0.05), whereas other tests did not show much difference. Springer Ismail, Shariman Ismadi Sulaiman, Norasrudin Adnan, Rahmat 2015 Book Section PeerReviewed Abdullah, Nagoor Meera and Mohamed, Mawarni and Tumijan, Wahidah and Parnabas, Vincent and Ponnusamy, Vellapandian and Mohamed Shapie, Mohamed Nizam and Omar Fauzee, Mohd Sofian (2015) The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium on Sports Science, Exercise, Engineering and Technology 2015 (ICoSSEET 2015). Springer, Singapore, pp. 203-213. ISBN 978-981-287-690-4 http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-691-1_22 doi:10.1007/978-981-287-691-1_22
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
topic L Education (General)
spellingShingle L Education (General)
Abdullah, Nagoor Meera
Mohamed, Mawarni
Tumijan, Wahidah
Parnabas, Vincent
Ponnusamy, Vellapandian
Mohamed Shapie, Mohamed Nizam
Omar Fauzee, Mohd Sofian
The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students
description The purpose of the study is to identify the differences of fitness profile between students with hearing impairment and students with visual impairment at secondary schools. A number of 62 subjects from two types of disabilities with 30 students who have hearing impairment (male = 21; female = 9) and 32 students with visual impairment (male = 18; female = 14) voluntarily participated in the study. A fitness profile was determined to identify the fitness level between two types of disabilities. Seven fitness tests were conducted on both groups such as 1600-m run test, 10-m agility run test, standing broad jump test, vertical jump test, handgrip strength test, sit and reach test, and sit-up test. The findings showed that students who are visually impaired performed better in sit-up test (36.50 ± 11.02), 1600-m run test (11.53 ± 2.26), and sit and reach test (31.09 ± 5.04) and students with hearing impairment performed better in handgrip strength test (right hand 29.27 ± 10.57) (left hand 27.48 ± 9.55), standing broad jump test (176.03 ± 43.26), and vertical jump test (40.00 ± 12.81) but with both groups showed similar strength in agility test. There was a significant difference in the sit-up test between two groups (0.0000, p ˃ 0.05), whereas other tests did not show much difference.
author2 Ismail, Shariman Ismadi
author_facet Ismail, Shariman Ismadi
Abdullah, Nagoor Meera
Mohamed, Mawarni
Tumijan, Wahidah
Parnabas, Vincent
Ponnusamy, Vellapandian
Mohamed Shapie, Mohamed Nizam
Omar Fauzee, Mohd Sofian
format Book Section
author Abdullah, Nagoor Meera
Mohamed, Mawarni
Tumijan, Wahidah
Parnabas, Vincent
Ponnusamy, Vellapandian
Mohamed Shapie, Mohamed Nizam
Omar Fauzee, Mohd Sofian
author_sort Abdullah, Nagoor Meera
title The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students
title_short The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students
title_full The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students
title_fullStr The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students
title_full_unstemmed The differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students
title_sort differences in physical fitness levels between hearing and visually impaired students
publisher Springer
publishDate 2015
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/26319/
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-691-1_22
_version_ 1644284569384386560
score 13.209306