Court execution of the lease agreement
Purpose - This study aimed to determine the provisions of Article 1576 Civil Code that states that tenants right are not interrupted because of the sale and purchase reviewed from legal theory (material rights and individuals) and justice theory. Considering the judge decision (execution) on the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://repo.uum.edu.my/24559/1/SICONSEM%202017%20105%20106.pdf http://repo.uum.edu.my/24559/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Purpose - This study aimed to determine the provisions of Article 1576 Civil Code that states that
tenants right are not interrupted because of the sale and purchase reviewed from legal theory
(material rights and individuals) and justice theory. Considering the judge decision (execution) on
the request is most important part in settling case process, because the execution not only ends
a dispute, but also provides a picture of legal certainty and rights protection for the public on the
sale of goods leased third party.
Methodology - This study uses normative legal approach (normative juridical) with the study
object in the form of positive legal norms, principles and legal theory derived from secondary data.This study describes norm by examining the problems and solutions in accordance with the sense of justice and practical needs.Findings - The results show that views from the legal theory (material rights and individuals) and justice theory, the applicant of the execution is more entitled to the leased goods than the tenant,
because the execution applicant has a material rights that are absolute and inherent is higher
level than tenants rights are individual and relative, so it is fairer if the applicant’s right to execution should take precedence over the tenant’s right |
|---|