Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure

In Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs), greedy forwarding strategy (GFS) seems to be the method of choice for position-based routing protocols. During the last decade GFS has become the subject of research.However, with greedy routing there is no guarantee that a node could always find a suitable next-r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-shugran, Mahmoud, Ghazali, Osman, Hassan, Suhaidi
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/19080/1/ICACSAT%202012%20355-359.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/19080/
http://doi.org/10.1109/ACSAT.2012.20
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.19080
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.190802016-11-10T01:58:42Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/19080/ Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure Al-shugran, Mahmoud Ghazali, Osman Hassan, Suhaidi QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science In Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs), greedy forwarding strategy (GFS) seems to be the method of choice for position-based routing protocols. During the last decade GFS has become the subject of research.However, with greedy routing there is no guarantee that a node could always find a suitable next-relay hop to forward its packet. Of such situation, forwarded packets might be ends at a concave (Hole) node that result in the forwarded packet to be dropped.This "Hole" node might be out of battery power, full congested or does not have neighbor(s) in the direction of ultimate destination, etc. Accordingly, this Hole is considered as vital section of the whole network which results that the whole MANET fails. Considering the problem of greedy failure at the network holes, several works have been proposed in the state. In this paper, we present these works in new classification with two categories. Moreover, an investigation of the proposed routing protocols corresponding to each category is conducted.Thus, besides the new classification, this paper presents an overview and a qualitative comparison of the existing position based routing protocols that tried to solve greedy failure. The noble goal of this classification and investigation is to conclude the most important features to be considered in rebuilding GFS to make it as standalone position based routing protocol.As future research efforts.Hopefully that GFS with the new features becomes more reliable and efficient that satisfies most MANET's applications. 2012 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/19080/1/ICACSAT%202012%20355-359.pdf Al-shugran, Mahmoud and Ghazali, Osman and Hassan, Suhaidi (2012) Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure. In: 2012 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies (ACSAT), 26-28 Nov. 2012, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. http://doi.org/10.1109/ACSAT.2012.20 doi:10.1109/ACSAT.2012.20
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Al-shugran, Mahmoud
Ghazali, Osman
Hassan, Suhaidi
Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure
description In Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs), greedy forwarding strategy (GFS) seems to be the method of choice for position-based routing protocols. During the last decade GFS has become the subject of research.However, with greedy routing there is no guarantee that a node could always find a suitable next-relay hop to forward its packet. Of such situation, forwarded packets might be ends at a concave (Hole) node that result in the forwarded packet to be dropped.This "Hole" node might be out of battery power, full congested or does not have neighbor(s) in the direction of ultimate destination, etc. Accordingly, this Hole is considered as vital section of the whole network which results that the whole MANET fails. Considering the problem of greedy failure at the network holes, several works have been proposed in the state. In this paper, we present these works in new classification with two categories. Moreover, an investigation of the proposed routing protocols corresponding to each category is conducted.Thus, besides the new classification, this paper presents an overview and a qualitative comparison of the existing position based routing protocols that tried to solve greedy failure. The noble goal of this classification and investigation is to conclude the most important features to be considered in rebuilding GFS to make it as standalone position based routing protocol.As future research efforts.Hopefully that GFS with the new features becomes more reliable and efficient that satisfies most MANET's applications.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Al-shugran, Mahmoud
Ghazali, Osman
Hassan, Suhaidi
author_facet Al-shugran, Mahmoud
Ghazali, Osman
Hassan, Suhaidi
author_sort Al-shugran, Mahmoud
title Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure
title_short Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure
title_full Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure
title_fullStr Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure
title_sort performance comparison of position-based routing protocols in the context of solving greedy failure
publishDate 2012
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/19080/1/ICACSAT%202012%20355-359.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/19080/
http://doi.org/10.1109/ACSAT.2012.20
_version_ 1644282612194213888
score 13.18916