Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET

This study aims at comparing study the performance of two transport protocols in MANET environment, which are TFRC and SCTP.Because fairness is one of the features in TFRC, it has attracted real-time applications, whereas multi-homing and multi streaming features in SCTP attracted multimedia applica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Awang Nor, Shahrudin, Dakkak, Omar
Other Authors: Zeng, Qing-An
Format: Book Section
Language:English
Published: Springer India 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/18349/1/WCNA%202014%20363%20370.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/18349/
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2580-5_34
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.18349
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.183492016-10-11T01:17:53Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/18349/ Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET Awang Nor, Shahrudin Dakkak, Omar TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering This study aims at comparing study the performance of two transport protocols in MANET environment, which are TFRC and SCTP.Because fairness is one of the features in TFRC, it has attracted real-time applications, whereas multi-homing and multi streaming features in SCTP attracted multimedia applications to use it as a transport protocol instead of TCP and UDP.However, both TFRC and SCTP are facing challenges.The challenge faced by TFRC, which uses additive increase, is to adjust the sending rate during periods with no congestion. This may lead to the short-term congestion that can degrade the quality of voice applications.On the other hand, SCTP faces challenges in the best-effort network.The simulation study was conducted in two scenarios; the first one is with the absence of background traffic, which is single traffic, whereas the second one is in the presence of background traffic, which is non-single traffic.For the simulation, NS-2 simulator was used, the mobility of the nodes was set randomly and the traffic type is CBR.In both scenarios, SCTP has better performance in terms of throughput, whereas TFRC has less delay than SCTP. AODV was chosen as a routing protocol for TFRC and SCTP with throughput and delay as the performance metrics. Springer India Zeng, Qing-An 2015 Book Section PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/18349/1/WCNA%202014%20363%20370.pdf Awang Nor, Shahrudin and Dakkak, Omar (2015) Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET. In: Wireless Communications, Networking and Applications. Springer India, pp. 363-370. ISBN 978-81-322-2579-9 http://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2580-5_34 doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2580-5_34
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Awang Nor, Shahrudin
Dakkak, Omar
Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET
description This study aims at comparing study the performance of two transport protocols in MANET environment, which are TFRC and SCTP.Because fairness is one of the features in TFRC, it has attracted real-time applications, whereas multi-homing and multi streaming features in SCTP attracted multimedia applications to use it as a transport protocol instead of TCP and UDP.However, both TFRC and SCTP are facing challenges.The challenge faced by TFRC, which uses additive increase, is to adjust the sending rate during periods with no congestion. This may lead to the short-term congestion that can degrade the quality of voice applications.On the other hand, SCTP faces challenges in the best-effort network.The simulation study was conducted in two scenarios; the first one is with the absence of background traffic, which is single traffic, whereas the second one is in the presence of background traffic, which is non-single traffic.For the simulation, NS-2 simulator was used, the mobility of the nodes was set randomly and the traffic type is CBR.In both scenarios, SCTP has better performance in terms of throughput, whereas TFRC has less delay than SCTP. AODV was chosen as a routing protocol for TFRC and SCTP with throughput and delay as the performance metrics.
author2 Zeng, Qing-An
author_facet Zeng, Qing-An
Awang Nor, Shahrudin
Dakkak, Omar
format Book Section
author Awang Nor, Shahrudin
Dakkak, Omar
author_sort Awang Nor, Shahrudin
title Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET
title_short Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET
title_full Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET
title_fullStr Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on the performance of TFRC and SCTP over AODV in MANET
title_sort comparative study on the performance of tfrc and sctp over aodv in manet
publisher Springer India
publishDate 2015
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/18349/1/WCNA%202014%20363%20370.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/18349/
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2580-5_34
_version_ 1644282437814976512
score 13.18916