What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender?

The purpose of this study is to determine gender differences and type of learning approaches among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) undergraduate students in English writing performance. The study involved 241 (32.8% male & 67.2% female) undergraduate students of UUM who were taking the Process W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veloo, Arsaythamby, Krishnasamy, Hariharan N., Harun, Hana Mulyani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/17503/1/IES%208%206%2046-55.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/17503/
http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p46
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.17503
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.175032016-04-28T01:19:07Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/17503/ What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender? Veloo, Arsaythamby Krishnasamy, Hariharan N. Harun, Hana Mulyani LB2300 Higher Education PE English The purpose of this study is to determine gender differences and type of learning approaches among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) undergraduate students in English writing performance. The study involved 241 (32.8% male & 67.2% female) undergraduate students of UUM who were taking the Process Writing course. This study uses a Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) by Biggs, Kember, and Leung (2001).This instrument assesses how students in higher learning institutions approach learning.In addition, data was also obtained from students’ overall performance in the Process Writing course.The overall score for the Process Writing course was 67.58% in which female scores were above the average score while the scores for males were below the average. Overall, the vast majority of UUM undergraduate students apply the surface approach compared to the deep approach. For the surface approach learning, more students chose the surface strategy when compared to the surface motive.For the deep learning strategy, most students chose the deep strategy compared to the deep motive. Very few students used a combination of both approaches.In the context of English language writing, students need to have an intrinsic interest in what is being discussed for their writing activities.An intrinsic interest will help to make learning meaningful as in the deep learning approach.However, the findings provide evidence that most female students who applied the surface approach managed to score well in their overall performance in Process Writing. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/17503/1/IES%208%206%2046-55.pdf Veloo, Arsaythamby and Krishnasamy, Hariharan N. and Harun, Hana Mulyani (2015) What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender? International Education Studies, 8 (6). pp. 46-55. ISSN 1913-9020 http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p46 doi:10.5539/ies.v8n6p46
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic LB2300 Higher Education
PE English
spellingShingle LB2300 Higher Education
PE English
Veloo, Arsaythamby
Krishnasamy, Hariharan N.
Harun, Hana Mulyani
What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender?
description The purpose of this study is to determine gender differences and type of learning approaches among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) undergraduate students in English writing performance. The study involved 241 (32.8% male & 67.2% female) undergraduate students of UUM who were taking the Process Writing course. This study uses a Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) by Biggs, Kember, and Leung (2001).This instrument assesses how students in higher learning institutions approach learning.In addition, data was also obtained from students’ overall performance in the Process Writing course.The overall score for the Process Writing course was 67.58% in which female scores were above the average score while the scores for males were below the average. Overall, the vast majority of UUM undergraduate students apply the surface approach compared to the deep approach. For the surface approach learning, more students chose the surface strategy when compared to the surface motive.For the deep learning strategy, most students chose the deep strategy compared to the deep motive. Very few students used a combination of both approaches.In the context of English language writing, students need to have an intrinsic interest in what is being discussed for their writing activities.An intrinsic interest will help to make learning meaningful as in the deep learning approach.However, the findings provide evidence that most female students who applied the surface approach managed to score well in their overall performance in Process Writing.
format Article
author Veloo, Arsaythamby
Krishnasamy, Hariharan N.
Harun, Hana Mulyani
author_facet Veloo, Arsaythamby
Krishnasamy, Hariharan N.
Harun, Hana Mulyani
author_sort Veloo, Arsaythamby
title What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender?
title_short What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender?
title_full What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender?
title_fullStr What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender?
title_full_unstemmed What are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in English process writing based on gender?
title_sort what are the learning approaches applied by undergraduate students in english process writing based on gender?
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
publishDate 2015
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/17503/1/IES%208%206%2046-55.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/17503/
http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p46
_version_ 1644282230570221568
score 13.214268