Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving

This study aims to identify the level of difficulty, discrimination and errors based on symbols, graphs and problem-solving in mathematics achievement.The participants consisted of 315 grade 10 students randomly selected from eight secondary day schools situated in the state of Kedah, Malaysia.The m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veloo, Arsaythamby, Krishnasamy, Hariharan N., Wan Abdullah, Wan Shahida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/17498/1/ASS%2011%2015%20324-334.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/17498/
http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n15p324
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.17498
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.174982016-04-28T01:21:17Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/17498/ Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving Veloo, Arsaythamby Krishnasamy, Hariharan N. Wan Abdullah, Wan Shahida L Education (General) QA Mathematics This study aims to identify the level of difficulty, discrimination and errors based on symbols, graphs and problem-solving in mathematics achievement.The participants consisted of 315 grade 10 students randomly selected from eight secondary day schools situated in the state of Kedah, Malaysia.The mathematics written test consisted of 15 open-ended items with five items each for symbols, graphs and problem-solving and all the items were analyzed using the difficulty and discrimination index.Semi-structured clinical interviews were also carried out among 20 selected students to identify the errors they had made in mathematics. In the content analysis, the descriptor code key was used to identify conceptual, careless, problem- solving and value errors.The findings showed that item 4 (Standard Form) of the symbols, item 6 (Linear Equation) of the graphs, and item 15 (Line & Plane in 3 Dimension) of the problem-solving was the most difficult item in mathematics.All of these items had a good discrimination as well as difficulty index. Content analysis showed that 52 (57%) students made conceptual errors, 22 (24%) made careless errors, 12 (13%) made problem-solving errors and 5 (6%) made value errors.The major reasons given for errors made were a lack of understanding, procedures being forgotten, negligence in transcribing information from the question, carelessness and guesswork. This study has implications for the student learning process and understanding graphs because graphs are widely used in daily life to manage, communicate and analyze information. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/17498/1/ASS%2011%2015%20324-334.pdf Veloo, Arsaythamby and Krishnasamy, Hariharan N. and Wan Abdullah, Wan Shahida (2015) Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving. Asian Social Science, 11 (15). pp. 324-334. ISSN 1911-2017 http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n15p324 doi:10.5539/ass.v11n15p324
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic L Education (General)
QA Mathematics
spellingShingle L Education (General)
QA Mathematics
Veloo, Arsaythamby
Krishnasamy, Hariharan N.
Wan Abdullah, Wan Shahida
Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving
description This study aims to identify the level of difficulty, discrimination and errors based on symbols, graphs and problem-solving in mathematics achievement.The participants consisted of 315 grade 10 students randomly selected from eight secondary day schools situated in the state of Kedah, Malaysia.The mathematics written test consisted of 15 open-ended items with five items each for symbols, graphs and problem-solving and all the items were analyzed using the difficulty and discrimination index.Semi-structured clinical interviews were also carried out among 20 selected students to identify the errors they had made in mathematics. In the content analysis, the descriptor code key was used to identify conceptual, careless, problem- solving and value errors.The findings showed that item 4 (Standard Form) of the symbols, item 6 (Linear Equation) of the graphs, and item 15 (Line & Plane in 3 Dimension) of the problem-solving was the most difficult item in mathematics.All of these items had a good discrimination as well as difficulty index. Content analysis showed that 52 (57%) students made conceptual errors, 22 (24%) made careless errors, 12 (13%) made problem-solving errors and 5 (6%) made value errors.The major reasons given for errors made were a lack of understanding, procedures being forgotten, negligence in transcribing information from the question, carelessness and guesswork. This study has implications for the student learning process and understanding graphs because graphs are widely used in daily life to manage, communicate and analyze information.
format Article
author Veloo, Arsaythamby
Krishnasamy, Hariharan N.
Wan Abdullah, Wan Shahida
author_facet Veloo, Arsaythamby
Krishnasamy, Hariharan N.
Wan Abdullah, Wan Shahida
author_sort Veloo, Arsaythamby
title Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving
title_short Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving
title_full Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving
title_fullStr Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving
title_full_unstemmed Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving
title_sort types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
publishDate 2015
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/17498/1/ASS%2011%2015%20324-334.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/17498/
http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n15p324
_version_ 1644282229989310464
score 13.19449