Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS

Inequality reduction in general and income inequality reduction in particular has occupied huge efforts/resources of the state since independence in India.Given that more than 300 million people are under poverty line in India today and the sheer deprivation that they face, evaluation of inequality...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V.J., Byra Reddy, C, Shashidhar, K.N, Veena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Othman Yeop Abdullah (OYA) Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/15810/1/artikal_jurnal_IPBJ_bab_3_1.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/15810/
http://oyagsb.uum.edu.my/index.php/ipbj-list-of-issue
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.15810
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.158102016-04-20T03:50:15Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/15810/ Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS V.J., Byra Reddy C, Shashidhar K.N, Veena HD28 Management. Industrial Management Inequality reduction in general and income inequality reduction in particular has occupied huge efforts/resources of the state since independence in India.Given that more than 300 million people are under poverty line in India today and the sheer deprivation that they face, evaluation of inequality reduction methods in India assume greater significance.In the above context, the present paper is an attempt to understand the effectiveness of income inequality reduction methods by the state, third sector and the combined intervention of the state and third sector.For this purpose four villages in the Gulbarga district of Karnataka were chosen to assess the relative effectiveness of the interventions by state, third sector and the combined interventions of state and third sector. The results of the study show that, Combined intervention of the State and Third Sector on Income inequalities through SHGs is distinctly better in providing regular employment to employed people than other types of intervention.Combined intervention of State and Third Sector in Income inequalities is distinctly better both in empowering people with higher incomes and discouraging people from borrowing money from money lenders at very high interest rates.It could also be concluded that combined intervention of State and Third Sector provides better terms of borrowing than State intervention alone or Third Sector intervention alone.Earning and saving patters are much better in combined intervention of State and Third Sector than other interventions. Othman Yeop Abdullah (OYA) Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia 2013 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/15810/1/artikal_jurnal_IPBJ_bab_3_1.pdf V.J., Byra Reddy and C, Shashidhar and K.N, Veena (2013) Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS. International Postgraduate Business Journal, 5 (1). pp. 49-65. ISSN 2180-2459 http://oyagsb.uum.edu.my/index.php/ipbj-list-of-issue
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic HD28 Management. Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28 Management. Industrial Management
V.J., Byra Reddy
C, Shashidhar
K.N, Veena
Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS
description Inequality reduction in general and income inequality reduction in particular has occupied huge efforts/resources of the state since independence in India.Given that more than 300 million people are under poverty line in India today and the sheer deprivation that they face, evaluation of inequality reduction methods in India assume greater significance.In the above context, the present paper is an attempt to understand the effectiveness of income inequality reduction methods by the state, third sector and the combined intervention of the state and third sector.For this purpose four villages in the Gulbarga district of Karnataka were chosen to assess the relative effectiveness of the interventions by state, third sector and the combined interventions of state and third sector. The results of the study show that, Combined intervention of the State and Third Sector on Income inequalities through SHGs is distinctly better in providing regular employment to employed people than other types of intervention.Combined intervention of State and Third Sector in Income inequalities is distinctly better both in empowering people with higher incomes and discouraging people from borrowing money from money lenders at very high interest rates.It could also be concluded that combined intervention of State and Third Sector provides better terms of borrowing than State intervention alone or Third Sector intervention alone.Earning and saving patters are much better in combined intervention of State and Third Sector than other interventions.
format Article
author V.J., Byra Reddy
C, Shashidhar
K.N, Veena
author_facet V.J., Byra Reddy
C, Shashidhar
K.N, Veena
author_sort V.J., Byra Reddy
title Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS
title_short Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS
title_full Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through SHGS
title_sort comparative assessment of the role of state, third sector and combined intervention of state and third sector in intervening income inequalities through shgs
publisher Othman Yeop Abdullah (OYA) Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia
publishDate 2013
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/15810/1/artikal_jurnal_IPBJ_bab_3_1.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/15810/
http://oyagsb.uum.edu.my/index.php/ipbj-list-of-issue
_version_ 1644281807846244352
score 13.153044