Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation

• Main Authors: Utomo, Christiono, Napiah, M, Idrus, Arazi, Khamidi, M. Faris
• Format: Citation Index Journal
• Published: 2009
• Subjects: TH Building construction
• Online Access: http://eprints.utp.edu.my/5344/1/v50-79%28Waset_Vol_50_2009%29.pdf; http://eprints.utp.edu.my/5344/

This paper presents a conceptual model of agreement options on negotiation support for civil engineering decision. The negotiation support facilitates the solving of group choice decision making problems in civil engineering decision to reduce the impact of mud volcano disaster in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. The approach based on application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi criteria decision on three level of decision hierarchy. Decisions for reducing impact is very complicated since many parties involved in a critical time. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing stakeholder preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a group choice decision support is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Such civil engineering solutions as alternatives are referred to as agreement options that are determined by identifying the possible stakeholder choice, followed by determining the optimal solution for each group of stakeholder. Determination of the optimal solution is based on a game theory model of n-person general sum game with complete information that involves forming coalitions among stakeholders.