TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902

Working Stress Design is currently used in the design of jacket platforms in Malaysia. Worldwide LRFD codes are being developed. To adopt LRFD code, calibration of resistance factors for joints is necessary in order that new joint designs have the same reliability as the existing designs. Tubular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sambu Potty, Narayanan, Cossa , N.J, Nizamani, Zafarullah, Idrus, Arazi
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utp.edu.my/3984/1/WEC-CBIT042.pdf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/3984/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.3984
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.39842017-03-20T01:59:51Z TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902 Sambu Potty, Narayanan Cossa , N.J Nizamani, Zafarullah Idrus, Arazi TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Working Stress Design is currently used in the design of jacket platforms in Malaysia. Worldwide LRFD codes are being developed. To adopt LRFD code, calibration of resistance factors for joints is necessary in order that new joint designs have the same reliability as the existing designs. Tubular joints are classified as simple, overlapping, congested or complex. Simple joints are further classified as K, T, Y or cross joints based on their configuration and load pattern. As a part of the ongoing research, the developments of the tubular joint strength models and their philosophy were studied. The joint strength models of API RP2A WSD (21st edition including 2nd supplement), API RP2A LRFD and ISO 19902 are presented and compared. The comparison includes the capacity of joints, relative joint and member strength, joint classification, joint detailing and the safety format. The conclusions from the study are reported. All codes use essentially the same equations with the differences for finding the characteristic force in respect of axial and moment resistance. Differences occur in the Strength factor (Qu) and the chord effect factor (Qf) leading to differences in the characteristic strengths calculated. ISO code is based on the latest research and has incorporated many changes. 2010-08-02 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/3984/1/WEC-CBIT042.pdf Sambu Potty, Narayanan and Cossa , N.J and Nizamani, Zafarullah and Idrus, Arazi (2010) TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902. In: WEC 2010, 2-5 August 2010, Kuching. Sarawak. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/3984/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Sambu Potty, Narayanan
Cossa , N.J
Nizamani, Zafarullah
Idrus, Arazi
TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902
description Working Stress Design is currently used in the design of jacket platforms in Malaysia. Worldwide LRFD codes are being developed. To adopt LRFD code, calibration of resistance factors for joints is necessary in order that new joint designs have the same reliability as the existing designs. Tubular joints are classified as simple, overlapping, congested or complex. Simple joints are further classified as K, T, Y or cross joints based on their configuration and load pattern. As a part of the ongoing research, the developments of the tubular joint strength models and their philosophy were studied. The joint strength models of API RP2A WSD (21st edition including 2nd supplement), API RP2A LRFD and ISO 19902 are presented and compared. The comparison includes the capacity of joints, relative joint and member strength, joint classification, joint detailing and the safety format. The conclusions from the study are reported. All codes use essentially the same equations with the differences for finding the characteristic force in respect of axial and moment resistance. Differences occur in the Strength factor (Qu) and the chord effect factor (Qf) leading to differences in the characteristic strengths calculated. ISO code is based on the latest research and has incorporated many changes.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Sambu Potty, Narayanan
Cossa , N.J
Nizamani, Zafarullah
Idrus, Arazi
author_facet Sambu Potty, Narayanan
Cossa , N.J
Nizamani, Zafarullah
Idrus, Arazi
author_sort Sambu Potty, Narayanan
title TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902
title_short TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902
title_full TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902
title_fullStr TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902
title_full_unstemmed TUBULAR JOINT STRENGTH MODELS IN API RP2A WSD, API RP2A LRFD AND ISO 19902
title_sort tubular joint strength models in api rp2a wsd, api rp2a lrfd and iso 19902
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.utp.edu.my/3984/1/WEC-CBIT042.pdf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/3984/
_version_ 1738655311278899200
score 13.211869