Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures

Most of the oil and natural gas resources are transported via pipelines. However, due to unavoidable factors such as corrosion and earthquakes, these pipelines frequently experience faults such as leaks. In the past, undetected leaks in pipelines resulted in massive human and material losses. Though...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mujtaba, S.M., Lemma, T.A., Vandrangi, S.K.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130777874&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijpvp.2022.104698&partnerID=40&md5=18ce1ebb33ee201a046bde621e6ba4bf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33312/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.33312
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.333122022-07-26T06:40:16Z Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures Mujtaba, S.M. Lemma, T.A. Vandrangi, S.K. Most of the oil and natural gas resources are transported via pipelines. However, due to unavoidable factors such as corrosion and earthquakes, these pipelines frequently experience faults such as leaks. In the past, undetected leaks in pipelines resulted in massive human and material losses. Though, it is possible to timely and accurately detect leaks or other faults in pipelines by improvising existing fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) methodologies. In this study, fault signatures are used to identify a leakage as well as a leaking section in a natural gas pipeline. A long transportation pipeline (up to 150 km) is simulated under transient conditions for the leak detection and diagnostics (LDD) study. Under normal operating conditions, mass flow rate measurements are used to estimate pipeline models based on autoregressive exogenous (ARX) model. Mass flow rate limits under leak-free conditions are defined by calculating adaptive thresholds. The models are tested for leakage at several locations; a minimum detectable leak with zero false alarm was 0.084 m in diameter (around 6 of the total diameter). Finally, the indicated leakage started the algorithm to identify the leaking section. Identification of a leaking section is based on a fault signature from three locations in a pipeline. The leaking section was detected by comparing a specific fault signature with a defined diagnostics matrix in the presence of 0.5 white noise. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Ltd 2022 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130777874&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijpvp.2022.104698&partnerID=40&md5=18ce1ebb33ee201a046bde621e6ba4bf Mujtaba, S.M. and Lemma, T.A. and Vandrangi, S.K. (2022) Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 199 . http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33312/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Most of the oil and natural gas resources are transported via pipelines. However, due to unavoidable factors such as corrosion and earthquakes, these pipelines frequently experience faults such as leaks. In the past, undetected leaks in pipelines resulted in massive human and material losses. Though, it is possible to timely and accurately detect leaks or other faults in pipelines by improvising existing fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) methodologies. In this study, fault signatures are used to identify a leakage as well as a leaking section in a natural gas pipeline. A long transportation pipeline (up to 150 km) is simulated under transient conditions for the leak detection and diagnostics (LDD) study. Under normal operating conditions, mass flow rate measurements are used to estimate pipeline models based on autoregressive exogenous (ARX) model. Mass flow rate limits under leak-free conditions are defined by calculating adaptive thresholds. The models are tested for leakage at several locations; a minimum detectable leak with zero false alarm was 0.084 m in diameter (around 6 of the total diameter). Finally, the indicated leakage started the algorithm to identify the leaking section. Identification of a leaking section is based on a fault signature from three locations in a pipeline. The leaking section was detected by comparing a specific fault signature with a defined diagnostics matrix in the presence of 0.5 white noise. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
format Article
author Mujtaba, S.M.
Lemma, T.A.
Vandrangi, S.K.
spellingShingle Mujtaba, S.M.
Lemma, T.A.
Vandrangi, S.K.
Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures
author_facet Mujtaba, S.M.
Lemma, T.A.
Vandrangi, S.K.
author_sort Mujtaba, S.M.
title Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures
title_short Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures
title_full Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures
title_fullStr Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures
title_full_unstemmed Leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures
title_sort leak diagnostics in natural gas pipelines using fault signatures
publisher Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2022
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130777874&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijpvp.2022.104698&partnerID=40&md5=18ce1ebb33ee201a046bde621e6ba4bf
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33312/
_version_ 1739833204724989952
score 13.164666